Jones Vectors and Polarization

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the analysis of linearly polarized light entering a medium and its transformation into right-handed and left-handed circularly polarized components. Participants explore how to express the initial x-polarized wave in terms of circular polarization components and calculate the resulting polarization as a function of distance z. There is confusion regarding the coefficients for the circular components and the resulting y-polarization, with emphasis on ensuring energy conservation in the derived expressions. Ultimately, the focus is on determining conditions for achieving linear polarization in the y direction. The conversation highlights the complexities of polarization transformations and the importance of correctly applying wave equations.
Yoni V
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Linearly polarized light in the x direction with wave number ##k_0## travels in the z direction. It enters a medium such that a RHCP component of the wave and a LHCP component each accumulate a phase of ##n_Rk_0z## and ##n_Lk_0z## respectively, where z is the distance traveled inside the medium.
a. What is the polarization of the wave as a function of z?
b. For which values of z do we get a linear polarization in the y direction?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


It's kind of a warm-up question and should be pretty easy, but I guess I'm missing something elementary...
I suppose I should write the wave in terms of ##\hat r## and ##\hat l##, apply the given transformation for each component, and then rewrite the answer in terms of ##\hat x, \hat y##. But I'm stuck on step 1, which is writing my initial x-polarized wave in terms of ## \hat r, \hat l##. Any advice, an analogous example or a more general treatment?

Thanks...

Edit: latex fixes...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yoni V said:
I suppose I should write the wave in terms of ##\hat{r} ## and ##\hat{l}##,
Yes that's right. Now it's a matter of finding the correct coefficients for ##\hat{r}## and ##\hat{l}##.
Do you know the Jones vectors for linearly and circularly polarized light?
 
Yes, the vectors are ##\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(1,-i), \frac{1}{\sqrt 2}(1,i)## for circularly polarized light, and (a,b) for some linear polarization.
But I'm not sure how the initial linear input should be written.

I thought that if ## E_0 = E_{x0} \hat x ## then
$$\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}E_{x0} (exp(in_Rk_0z)+exp(in_Lk_0z))\hat x+\frac{i}{\sqrt 2}E_{x0} (exp(in_Lk_0z)-exp(in_Rk_0z))\hat y$$
but that doesn't seem right, given the fact that I'm left with an imaginary y component, and then for the second part of the question, I need the x component to be 0. But then I get ##z= \frac{2\pi m -\pi}{k_0(n_L-n_R)}##, which leaves the y component with imaginary amplitude.
 
We want to write ##E_0 \hat{x} = E_0 \left( c_l \hat{l} + c_r \hat{r} \right)##. Using the property
$$
\begin{aligned}
&\hat{l}^\dagger \hat{r} = 0 \\
&\hat{l}^\dagger \hat{l} = 1 \\
&\hat{r}^\dagger \hat{r} = 1 \\
\end{aligned}
$$
, how can you determine ##c_l## and ##c_r##?
 
Ok, we can solve for them by
$$
\begin{pmatrix}1\\
0
\end{pmatrix}=\frac{c_{l}}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\
i
\end{pmatrix}+\frac{c_{r}}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}1\\
-i
\end{pmatrix}\Rightarrow c_{l}=c_{r}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$
and now
$$
\mathbf{E} = E_{0}\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}\hat{r}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}\hat{l}\right)
= E_{0}\left(\frac{1}{2}e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}\left(\hat{x}-i\hat{y}\right)+\frac{1}{2}e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}\left(\hat{x}+i\hat{y}\right)\right)
= E_{0}\left(\frac{1}{2}\left(e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}+e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}\right)\hat{x}+\frac{i}{2}\left(e^{in_{L}k_{0}z}-e^{in_{R}k_{0}z}\right)\hat{y}\right)
$$
which is different from what I had before only by a factor of ##1/\sqrt{2}##. The problem with y-polarization remains, hinting that this is still incorrect...
 
Yoni V said:
The problem with y-polarization remains, hinting that this is still incorrect...
The question only asks you to generate y-polarized output regardless of whatever phase delay it may have accumulated.
 
Ok, got it, it indeed doesn't matter- we can decompose the expression for the y component and take the real part.
One last thing, I didn't understand your discussion of the dot products. Is there anything wrong with how I calculated the coefficients?
 
Yoni V said:
Ok, got it, it indeed doesn't matter- we can decompose the expression for the y component and take the real part.
One last thing, I didn't understand your discussion of the dot products. Is there anything wrong with how I calculated the coefficients?
I don't know how you calculated the coefficients which lead to how it looks like in post #3, but the form you derived there bears violation of energy conservation. You can check that the form in post #2 carries different energy from the incident one, which is ##E_0^2##.
 
Back
Top