Jordan Decomposition: Solve 4x4 Matrix Eqn

  • Thread starter Thread starter springo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decomposition
springo
Messages
125
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find a Jordan decomposition for:
\[ \left( \begin{array}{cccc}<br /> 2 &amp; 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 2 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 3 &amp; 0 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 2 &amp; -2 &amp; 4 &amp; 6 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 1 &amp; -1 &amp; -1 \end{array} \right)\]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I found the eigenvalues: 2 (m=4).
I also found the eigenvectors:
\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}1 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0\end{array} \right)\]\[ \left( \begin{array}{c}-1 &amp; 0 &amp; -2 &amp; 1\end{array} \right)\]
But then I see that (A-2I)2 = 0.
So how do I continue?

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If 2 is an eigenvalue of multiplicity 4, then (A- 2I)4= 0. There must exist v such that (A- 2I)v= 0 which is the same as Av= 2v: v is an eigenvector corresponding to eigenvalue 2. You say you have found two independent eigenvectors, v1 and v2. But since the multiplicity is 4, there must now exist a vector v such that (A- 2I)v is NOT 0 but (A- 2I)3v= 0. But (A- 2I)3v= (A-2I)3(A- 2I)v= 0. Since (A- 2I)v1= 0 and (A- 2I)v2= 0m that is the same (A- 2I)3v= v1 or (A- 2I)3v= v2[/sup]. If only one of those has a solution, say v3, then there must be a solution to (A- 2I)2v= v3[/sup].
If the first is the case, the Jordan Normal Form is
\begin{bmatrix}2 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\0 &amp; 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 2\end{bmatrix}

If the second is the case, the Jordan Normal Form is
\begin{bmatrix}2 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 1 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 2 &amp; 1 \\ 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 &amp; 2\end{bmatrix}
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top