Jump Shot Effect on Basketball: Does It Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Macroer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basketball Jump
AI Thread Summary
The jump shot in basketball enhances shooting accuracy by utilizing leg power to accelerate the ball, allowing the arms to focus on precision. Jumping increases the release height, reducing the likelihood of the shot being blocked. Additionally, the momentum generated from jumping contributes to the overall effectiveness of the shot. This combination of leg and arm coordination is crucial for achieving optimal shooting performance. Understanding these mechanics can improve shooting techniques in basketball.
Macroer
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I was wondering if the act of jumping itself has an effect on the ball as it is released out of the players hands(ex. momentum etc.). I know that the increased height decreases the chance of the ball from being blocked, but i was wondering if it does more than that.
Thank You
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jump shot uses also your legs, instead of just arms, to accelerate the ball. This allows the arms to work less but more accurately, and just do the "fine tuning".
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top