Just wondering about x^y = y^x

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sink41
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the equation x^y = y^x and its graphical representation, revealing two lines: y = x and another resembling y = e^(e/x). The poster seeks to express this equation in the form of functions y = f(t) and x = g(t) and is curious about the specific line that appears similar to y = e^(e/x). They express difficulty in solving these questions due to their current A-level math background and mention challenges with graphing programs that require functions in a specific format. The Lambert W function is suggested as a potential tool for solving the equation, and there are mentions of using a 3D graphing approach to visualize the relationship. The discussion highlights the complexities of graphing implicit functions and the need for accessible mathematical tools.
Sink41
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
This wasnt set for homework just something i thought up so i hope this is the right place to post?

Anyway when i put x^y = y^x (or also lnx/lny = x/y) in a graphing program i realized that there were two lines, y = x and another line that looked a bit like y = e^(e/x) but wasnt.


So this kind of interested me... and i have two questions:

can y^x = x^y be written as y = f(t) and x = g(t) and if so what are f(t) and g(t)?

Is it possible to find the equation of just the line that looks like y = e^(e/x) ?


I have thought about it a bit but have no idea how to go about solving either question. Any degree level maths will be beyond me (doing A level atm) so hopefully there is something simple that i have overlooked?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How did you put xy= yx into a graphing program? Most graphing programs require that the function be put in the form y= f(x) which is the whole problem here.

Solving yx= xy, or, equivalently, y= xy/x for y looks to me like it would involve the "Lambert W function", defined as the inverse to the function f(x)= xex.
 
There was an old thread about this. One thing you can do is graph in 3-d z = x^y - y^x
 
I used a trial version of derive 6 and plugged x^y=y^x straight in. It only plotted for positive values and went a bit crazy at high values of x and y. I think it was fairly accurate though. I remember putting one of the values for the non x=y line into my calculator and it working.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top