K&K First Chapter - Is it necessary?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tridianprime
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the necessity of the first chapter of K&K, which covers mathematical preliminaries, particularly vectors and kinematics. Participants express that while the chapter is filled with examples, it may not be essential to complete it before advancing to the next chapter on Newton's laws. Users report successfully skipping the prelim chapter in other texts, such as Kibble's "Classical Mechanics," without encountering significant issues later in the book. Overall, it is concluded that readers can refer back to the prelim chapter as needed without hindering their understanding of subsequent material.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vectors and kinematics
  • Familiarity with mathematical concepts relevant to physics
  • Basic knowledge of Newtonian mechanics
  • Experience with academic texts in physics, such as Kibble's "Classical Mechanics"
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the applications of vectors in physics
  • Study the principles of Newton's laws of motion
  • Review plane polar coordinates and their relevance in physics
  • Investigate the structure and content of K&K's subsequent chapters
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, educators seeking to understand the pedagogical approach of K&K, and anyone evaluating the necessity of foundational mathematical concepts in advanced physics texts.

tridianprime
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
I have been reading the first chapter of K&K which is one the mathematical preliminaries supposedly and it includes lots of examples of applications of vectors/kinematics and so forth. I am about 2/3 of the way throughout it (into plane polar coordinates) and it seems as though it is just example after example. I feel I am comfortable with the mathematics because I have studied it before this book. The author says at one point that it is really to get you versed in the mathematics of vectors so I was wondering if it would be ok to advance in the book and whether it would hinder me greatly to not have rigorously studied every example in the prelim chapter.

Are the physics concepts in the prelim chapters covered again? Could I just refer back to it if necessary later on in the book? What are your experiences and thoughts on this chapter?

It's not that it hasn't been interesting but it feels cluttered and I am just eager to go onto the next chapter on the Newtons laws - foundations of Newtonian mechanics. Thanks for any feedback. If I really have to do the prelims I will because I want to study this book either way but it would be good to go to the next chapter if possible.

P.s. I am not so much talking about encountering problems in the next chapter but more so the chances of having issues late run the book. The reason for this is because I have studied a small amount in Kibbles 'Classical Mechanics'.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I skipped chapter 1 completely and never once needed it when working through the rest of the book.

You can just refer back to it when necessary. It's just boring math in my opinion.
 
WannabeNewton said:
I skipped chapter 1 completely and never once needed it when working through the rest of the book.

You can just refer back to it when necessary. It's just boring math in my opinion.

Ok, great. Thanks. I have gone onto the next chapter since I started the thread just to get an idea as to what it was like and it seems to be written in a clear way. I will give it a go.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K