K values with acid and base reactions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the equilibrium constants for the reactions involving ammonia (NH3) and its interactions with water. It clarifies that while both Kb expressions for NH3 in relation to NH4+ and OH- are derived from the same fundamental reactions, they are not equivalent due to the presence of two interacting reactions. To find the hydroxide (OH-) concentration, the first equilibrium constant can be used, while the second is necessary for determining the hydrogen ion (H+) concentration. The relationship between Kb and Kw is also highlighted, suggesting that dividing Kb by Kw can yield the appropriate Ka for the second reaction. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately calculating concentrations in acid-base reactions.
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Given an aqueous solution (I'm omitting the subscripts):

## NH_3 + H_2O ←→ NH_4^+ + OH^- K_b ##Then we can also say:

## NH_3 + H^+ ←→ NH_4^+ K_b ## as well since they're equivalent reactions, right? They both have the same Kb value as a result, right?

So then, ## K_b = \frac {[NH_4^+][OH^-]}{[NH_3]} = \frac{[NH_4^+]}{[NH_3][H^+]} ##

I would just like to clarify, is this true? It looks like ##[OH^-] = \frac{1}{[H^+]}##

Is this true? Does it take into account the constant "concentration" of the water in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[h^+][oh^-]=10^{-14}
 
Chestermiller said:
[h^+][oh^-]=10^{-14}

Ok. So are the two K expressions not equivalent? I just don't understand why since they're representing the same reaction, are they not?
 
MathewsMD said:
Ok. So are the two K expressions not equivalent? I just don't understand why since they're representing the same reaction, are they not?
There are actually two interacting reactions involved. One is NH3 + H2O, and the other one is OH+H going to H2O. If you're only interested in finding the OH concentration, and the original solution is pH=7, then you can solve for the new OH concentration using the first equilibrium constant. However, if you also want to find the new H+ concentration, you need to use the second equilibrium constant (OH+H). Your second reaction expression is not in a form that you can use to solve directly and uniquely for the product concentrations (and, of course, the K has to be modified).

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
There are actually two interacting reactions involved. One is NH3 + H2O, and the other one is OH+H going to H2O. If you're only interested in finding the OH concentration, and the original solution is pH=7, then you can solve for the new OH concentration using the first equilibrium constant. However, if you also want to find the new H+ concentration, you need to use the second equilibrium constant (OH+H). Your second reaction expression is not in a form that you can use to solve directly and uniquely for the product concentrations (and, of course, the K has to be modified).

Chet

Oh okay! Thank you! So would I just divide Kb by Kw to get the second reaction I specified?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top