Kaon discovered by the unusual fork

  • Thread starter Thread starter nonequilibrium
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kaon
nonequilibrium
Messages
1,412
Reaction score
2
Kaon discovered by "the unusual fork"

So historically (reading about it in Griffiths) the (neutral) kaon was discovered by noting that there was some neutral particle decaying into a positive and neutral pion.

But how did they know at the time (1947) that it was not the neutron doing this? Of course now we know this is not possible due to, say, baryon number. But how did they know it wasn't the neutron at the time. The only thing I can think of is that the kaon lifetime is shorter than the neutron's. Is that it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Neutrons are "stable" in accelerator experiments - while you might see a decay from time to time, usual flight times are measured in nanoseconds, while the lifetime of the neutrons is several minutes.
In addition, if you can measure the momentum of the charged and neutral pion, you can reconstruct the mass of the decayed particle.

there was some neutral particle decaying into a positive and neutral pion.
Charge conservation? Do you mean positive+negative pion?
 


Yes, sorry, I meant negative.

And thanks for the answer.
 


Furthermore, the decay you discuss, called K2pi, has only the two pions in the final state; if one measured the momentum of those pions and calculated the mass of the parent, oine always got about 500 MeV, half of the neutron's mass. That demonstrates that it's not neutrons.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top