Kepler's 2nd.law and calculation

  • Thread starter Thread starter shounakbhatta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculation
AI Thread Summary
Kepler's Second Law relates to the conservation of angular momentum, where the area swept out by a planet in its orbit is proportional to the time taken. The area of a triangle can be calculated using the formula 1/2 base x height, with the base defined as the arc length (dx) and height (h). For elliptical orbits, the relationship between radius (r), arc length (ds), and speed (v) is crucial, particularly at the ends of the major axis. However, at other points in the orbit, the angle between r and ds requires the inclusion of a sine or cosine factor for accurate area calculation. Understanding these nuances is essential for correctly applying Kepler's Second Law in various orbital scenarios.
shounakbhatta
Messages
287
Reaction score
1
Hello,

While dealing with Kepler's 2nd.law, when calculating the area of the triangle which sweeps out:


Area of a triangle = 1/2 base x height

Now, we know dθ = dx/r (where dx = arc length, r=radius)

So, dx= rdθ

So, area of a triangle = 1/2 base(rdθ) x height(h)

Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If dx is defined to be something like an "arc length in tangential direction", yes. It is not the actual arc length if the motion is not circular.
 
Keep in mind that Kepler's Second Law is just another way of saying that angular momentum is conserved. In other words, ##\omega r^2## is a constant. Keeping in mind that for a small section h = r, this is in agreement with what you wrote.
 
Thank you very much for letting me clear the confusion.
 
Hope I'm not going to regenerate the confusion, but for an elliptical orbit there are just two places where the triangle area is given by \frac{1}{2} r\ ds = \frac{1}{2} rv\ dt, and those are the two ends of the major axis. [I'm using ds as infinitesimal portion of arc length, r as distance from focus and v as speed of orbiting body.]

At every other point, r and ds are not perpendicular to each other, so a sine or cosine factor has to be inserted.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top