Kepler's Third Law satellite problem

AI Thread Summary
To determine the altitude of a synchronous orbit over Pluto, the equation r = [(G*M*T^2)/4pi^2]^(1/3) is used, with G as the gravitational constant, M as Pluto's mass, and T as the orbital period. After calculating the radius, which results in approximately 1.89e^7 m, the radius of Pluto (1,153,000 m) is subtracted to find the altitude, yielding 1.77e^4 km. Despite this calculation, the answer is marked incorrect in the system, prompting a request for assistance in identifying potential errors in the approach. Other participants confirm the calculations align with their own, suggesting the issue may lie elsewhere. Further clarification or verification of the input values may be necessary to resolve the discrepancy.
bonekrushur
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An orbiting satellite stays over a certain spot on the equator of (rotating) Pluto. What is the altitude (in km) of the orbit (called a "synchronous orbit")?


Homework Equations


r = [(G*M*T^2)/4pi^2]^(1/3)
h= r-radius of pluto


The Attempt at a Solution


I have plugged in the numbers (6.67e^-11) for G, (1.31e^22 kg) for M, and (551852 s) for T. I get (1.89e^7 m) for the radius. Then I subtract 1,153,000 meters from my answer to account for the radius of Pluto. My final answer in meters is (1.77e^7 m). My final answer in km is (1.77e^4 km). However, when I input this, the system shows this is wrong. I've tried several variations of the answer, but nothing works. Does anyone know if I've overlooked something in the equation? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems right.
 
I get the same answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top