Key equation with uniform acceleration and projectile motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding key equations related to uniform acceleration and projectile motion in physics. A new member, Liszzy, seeks clarification on kinematic equations, particularly how to analyze projectile motion by separating horizontal and vertical components. It is emphasized that the angle of launch significantly affects the projectile's distance and height, with 45° yielding maximum distance and 90° maximizing height and airtime. Participants suggest deriving these relationships through equations to better grasp the concepts. Overall, the thread provides insights into optimizing projectile motion through angle adjustments.
Liszzy
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
<< Mentor Note -- thread moved from the New Member Introduction forum because of the general nature of the question >>

Hi guys, I'm Liszzy newly join physics group. How are you everyone? I'm doing my Canadian diploma in physics and need help from you guys. I've doubt in Kinematic chapter especially the key equation with uniform acceleration and projectile motion. Kindly please send me if there is any link or notes about kinematic topic for better understanding :) Thank you and have a wonderful day
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Liszzy, Which equation and what is your doubt? The key to understanding simple projectile motion is to treat the motion in the horizontal and vertical separately. The horizontal part is at constant velocity. The vertical part is at constant acceleration. Write two equations, one for each and then solve the simultaneous equations to find whichever parameter you need.
 
  • Like
Likes Liszzy
Thanks for the explanation mate :) If you increase/decrease the variable what effect you think it will have on the motion of the projectile. Will the projectile go farther? Higher? Stay in the air longer? Is there an optimum value to make the projectile go as far as possible?
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
Which variable?
 
Liszzy said:
Thanks for the explanation mate :) If you increase/decrease the variable what effect you think it will have on the motion of the projectile. Will the projectile go farther? Higher? Stay in the air longer? Is there an optimum value to make the projectile go as far as possible?
There is, the angle of the shot. You can guess it's correct value, but better would be to prove it the way suggested.
 
  • Like
Likes Liszzy
Liszzy said:
Thanks for the explanation mate :) If you increase/decrease the variable what effect you think it will have on the motion of the projectile. Will the projectile go farther? Higher? Stay in the air longer? Is there an optimum value to make the projectile go as far as possible?
For a static planar non-sloped surface model with constant perpendicular gravity, and assuming less than escape velocity, launched projectiles, e.g. bolts shot from a crossbow, at 45° will travel the maximum distance, and at 90° (i.e. straight up) will go highest and stay in the air longest.
 
  • Like
Likes Liszzy
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top