Kinematics - Acceleration equation confustion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on confusion regarding the acceleration equation in kinematics, specifically the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and position. The equation a = dv/dt is correctly established, but participants clarify that it can also be expressed as a = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) through the application of the chain rule. This manipulation is valid and does not imply that acceleration is simply dv/dx; instead, it shows how acceleration relates to velocity and position. Misunderstandings arise from incorrect cross multiplication and misinterpretation of differential terms. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that acceleration can be expressed in different forms while maintaining its fundamental definition.
help1please
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Kinematics -- Acceleration equation confustion

I have been following a derivation and can't quite wrap my head round what is happening. I don't know if the person who wrote it has made a mistake somewhere or I am making the mistake.

I am informed that

a = \frac{dv}{dt}

Fine. Then I am told

a= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}

(which is odd, one moment it is dv/dt now it seems to be dv/dx)

and that I should convince myself that this is the acceleration through a cross multiplication... but I did it and I got

\frac{dvdt}{dx dx}

This surely isn't acceleration, have I made a mistake somewhere? And if the person I am following is wrong, what is the correct way to state this...?

They further said that

\frac{dx}{dt}

is just velocity, so they end up with

a = v \frac{dv}{dx}

Can someone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


help1please said:
... a= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}

(which is odd, one moment it is dv/dt now it seems to be dv/dx) ...

No.

The acceleration a does NOT seem to be dv/dx.

It would seem that a is dv/dx if we have a = dv/dx and we do not have that because we have instead that

a = (dv/dx)(dx/dt).
 


Assume that the acceleration is function of the position x: a=a(x(t)), a composite function of t. You get the derivative with respect to t if you derive with respect to x first then derive x with respect to t.

da(x(t))/dt=(da/dx)*(dx/dt).

ehild
 


Hi help1please,
you just messed up your cross multiplication
dv/dx * dx/dt is not dvdt/dxdx but dvdx/dtdx as you can see, you could just as well simplify by the 'artificially' injected dx/dx (=1) and get back to a=dv/dt

Cheers...
 


Acceleration is (dv/dt) but by application of the chain rule this can be written as a = (dv/dx)(dx/dt) because we are effectively cancelling out the dx top and bottom.
(I say effectively because dx is really a differential operator)

In your last eqn, (dx/dt) = v so we get a = v (dv/dx)

This sort of chain rule application can be important if you want to find the velocity of a particle as a function of position, acceleration as function of velocity etc.., although this requires some extra mathematics.(Separable diff eqns)
 


You probably understand it by now but..

a = dv/dt

Multiply top and bottom by dx

= (dv/dt)(dx/dx)

rearrange

= (dv/dx)(dx/dt)
 


help1please said:
Fine. Then I am told

a= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}

(which is odd, one moment it is dv/dt now it seems to be dv/dx)

That's simply some manipulation (multiplying numerator and denominator by same thing), scratch out dx from numerator and denominator, you get the same expression as before. :wink:
 


oli4 said:
Hi help1please,
you just messed up your cross multiplication
dv/dx * dx/dt is not dvdt/dxdx but dvdx/dtdx as you can see, you could just as well simplify by the 'artificially' injected dx/dx (=1) and get back to a=dv/dt

Cheers...

I didn't mess up anything, it was work I was following and noticed something was wrong, that's all. But thanks!
 
Back
Top