Kinematics (constant acceleration)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around three kinematics problems involving constant acceleration, where the original poster struggles with applying the correct equations and understanding units. In the first problem, the calculations for distance and speed are flawed due to incorrect unit handling, leading to confusion about the results. The second problem highlights the need to differentiate between distance and acceleration, with suggestions to use average speed for calculating time through a board. The third problem raises questions about the separation of two racing cars, indicating a misunderstanding of the time variable and the need for proper equation application. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting physical quantities and their units in kinematics.
HelenaBeena
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have three problems that have stumped me. I attempted to utilize the equations my teacher said we'd be using but I don't know where I went wrong or what each equation is specifically for (e.g. finding displacement in constant acceleration or whatnot). Am I using the equations correctly? :rolleyes:

1st Problem: A car accelerates from rest at a constant rate of 2.0 m/s^2 for 5.0s. A) What is the speed of the car at that time? B) How far does the car travel in this time?

My workings:

x = Vot + 1/2at^2
x = 0(5.0s) + 1/2(2.0 m/s^2)(5.0s)^2
= 0 + 1/2(2.0 m/s^2)(25.0 s^2)
= 50 m/s^4/2
= 25 m/s^4

2nd Problem: A bullet traveling horizontally at a speed of 350 m/s hits a board perpendicular to the surface, passed through it, and emerges on the other side at a speed of 210 m/s. If the board is 4.00 cm thick, how long does the bullet take to pass through it?

My workings:

I know that Vo or Vi is 350 m/s, A is 4.00 cm, Vf is 210 m/s but how do I convert the negative acceleration factor, A, into a speed? I also have no clue as to which equation to use for this.

3rd Problem: Two identical cars capable of accelerating at 3.00 m/s^2 are racing on a straight track and cross the starting line together with running starts. Car A has an initial speed of 2.50 m/s; car B starts with an initial speed of 5.00 m/s. A) What is the separation of the two cars after 10 m/s. B) Which car is moving faster after 10 s?

My workings:

By the separation of the two cars, do they mean displacement? I don't know where to proceed. So far..

A - 3.00 m/s^2 (I'm not sure of this as the problem used the word "capable")
Vo (A) - 2.5 m/s
Vo (B) - 5.00 m/s
T - 10 s
Vf - ?

When I use x=VoT + 1/2at^2 my result ends up with m/s^4. Am I using the wrong equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first problem you got worng units, i.e., are you sure that m.s-2.s2 is equal to m.s-4? Nevertheless, the answer is correct.
Also you did not solve (A). For that purpose the equation v(t) = v0 + at might be very useful.

For the second problem: do you know the equation vf2 = v02 + 2ax or how to work it out?
 
HelenaBeena said:
1st Problem: A car accelerates from rest at a constant rate of 2.0 m/s^2 for 5.0s. A) What is the speed of the car at that time? B) How far does the car travel in this time?

My workings:

x = Vot + 1/2at^2
x = 0(5.0s) + 1/2(2.0 m/s^2)(5.0s)^2
= 0 + 1/2(2.0 m/s^2)(25.0 s^2)
= 50 m/s^4/2
= 25 m/s^4
Distance is in metres, not metres/s^4. So the correct answer to B) is 25 m. I assume you had no difficulty with A).

2nd Problem: A bullet traveling horizontally at a speed of 350 m/s hits a board perpendicular to the surface, passed through it, and emerges on the other side at a speed of 210 m/s. If the board is 4.00 cm thick, how long does the bullet take to pass through it?

My workings:

I know that Vo or Vi is 350 m/s, A is 4.00 cm, Vf is 210 m/s but how do I convert the negative acceleration factor, A, into a speed? I also have no clue as to which equation to use for this.
It always helps to draw a graph of speed vs. time. The area under the graph over a time interval is the distance covered in that time interval. Assume a constant force (constant deceleration). Write the expression for d in terms of vi and vf and \Delta t (just divide into a rectangle and a triangle). Solve for \Delta t. You will see that this is the same as finding the average speed (since we are assuming constant deceleration, this is simply the average of the initial and final speeds) and dividing the distance by that average speed.

Now see if you can work out the third question on your own.

AM
 
Last edited:
HelenaBeena said:
I have three problems that have stumped me. I attempted to utilize the equations my teacher said we'd be using but I don't know where I went wrong or what each equation is specifically for (e.g. finding displacement in constant acceleration or whatnot). Am I using the equations correctly? :rolleyes:

1st Problem: A car accelerates from rest at a constant rate of 2.0 m/s^2 for 5.0s. A) What is the speed of the car at that time? B) How far does the car travel in this time?

My workings:

x = Vot + 1/2at^2
x = 0(5.0s) + 1/2(2.0 m/s^2)(5.0s)^2
= 0 + 1/2(2.0 m/s^2)(25.0 s^2)
= 50 m/s^4/2
= 25 m/s^4
What does this problem ask you to find? Are you even aware that there are two questions- since you give only one answer?
You say you are not sure what the equations are used for. I recommend that you explicitely write out what your variables represent- and include the units.
What is "x" in this problem? What is t? You clearly know that a is the acceleration, in m/s2 since you substitute the given 2.0 m/s2 and apparently know that t is time, in seconds, since you use that. But is x what you want to find? Oh, and while it is a very good thing to "calculate" with the units, be sure that you do it correctly: \frac{m}{s^2}(sec^2) is not equal to m/sec^4! In fact, you should know that there is no quantity measured in m/sec^4. In fact, the "s2"s cancel and \frac{m}{s^2}(sec^2} gives m. That's correct because the x in this equation is the distance, in meters, that the object has moved. But (A) asks for speed, not distance. It is (B) that asks for the distance.

2nd Problem: A bullet traveling horizontally at a speed of 350 m/s hits a board perpendicular to the surface, passed through it, and emerges on the other side at a speed of 210 m/s. If the board is 4.00 cm thick, how long does the bullet take to pass through it?

My workings:

I know that Vo or Vi is 350 m/s, A is 4.00 cm, Vf is 210 m/s but how do I convert the negative acceleration factor, A, into a speed? I also have no clue as to which equation to use for this.
Frankly, you seem to be focusing too much on memorizing equations rather than learning the physics. You do not "know that A is 4.00 cm" if by A you mean a, the acceleration. 4.00 cm is a distance[/ b] not an acceleration. The problem tells you "the board is 4.00 cm thick". You should have learned immediately that speed is "distance moved divided by time"- which is why the units for speed are m/s. You should also have learned that acceleration is "change in speed divided by time"- it has units of (m/s)/s= m/s2. For the simple "constant acceleration" problems you have here you can use the fact that the "average speed" during acceleration is just the average of the first and last speeds. Here the average speed is (350+210)/2= 560/2= 280 m/s. How long will it take the bullet to go 4.00 cm= 0.004 m at that speed?

identical cars capable of accelerating at 3.00 m/s^2 are racing on a straight track and cross the starting line together with running starts. Car A has an initial speed of 2.50 m/s; car B starts with an initial speed of 5.00 m/s. A) What is the separation of the two cars after 10 m/s. B) Which car is moving faster after 10 s? [/I]

My workings:

By the separation of the two cars, do they mean displacement? I don't know where to proceed. So far..

A - 3.00 m/s^2 (I'm not sure of this as the problem used the word "capable")
Vo (A) - 2.5 m/s
Vo (B) - 5.00 m/s
T - 10 s
Vf - ?

When I use x=VoT + 1/2at^2 my result ends up with m/s^4. Am I using the wrong equation?
I agree that saying the cars are "capable" of 3 m/s2 acceleration is ambiguous. The only way you can possibly do this problem is to assume that the actually are accelerating at 3 m/s2. Since you know (or should know- see above) that acceleration is "change in speed divided by time", you know that "change in speed"
is acceleration times time, so original speed is initial speed plus that: vf= at+ vo.
Again, there are two questions- you only show working for the second. I feel sure the the problem does not ask "A) What is the separation of the two cars after 10 m/s" because 10 m/s is a speed and it would not make sense to say "after 10 m/s". Re-read the problem. Doesn't it say "after 10 s"? Here you can use your distance equation:
x= v0t+ (a/2)t2 to find how far each car goes in 10 seconds, then subtract to find the distance between them.
 
There was no need to be so aggressive and harsh with me.

Also, I tried to use A, 4.00 cm, as a factor for deceleration, thus my confusion.
 
HelenaBeena said:
There was no need to be so aggressive and harsh with me.

Also, I tried to use A, 4.00 cm, as a factor for deceleration, thus my confusion.
I am quite sure that Halls was not trying to be harsh or aggressive. I think if you reread his posts you will see that he is pointing out some very basic errors you are making with units.

When you speak about distance the units must be in distance (eg. m) not time. When you speak about speed, units must be distance/time (eg. m/sec). For acceleration, units must be in speed/time = distance/time^2. No one here will understand what you mean when you say A = 4.00 cm if A is acceleration, which is what you seem to be saying.

In problem 2, the speed change is 140 m/sec. The average speed
through the board is __________? Average speed is total distance over total time, so if you work out the average speed, you can determine the time. The acceleration is change in speed divided by the time interval, so you can work that out too. Just make sure you have the units right.

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top