Kinematics of a linkage system of 4 bars

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a kinematics problem involving a four-bar linkage system, where the user is tasked with tabulating and plotting the angular position, velocity, and acceleration of θ4 over time. The user initially attempted to use a geometric equation but found it unhelpful, leading to the application of Freudenstein's Equation for a more complex solution. After inputting the values, they derived a complicated equation for θ5 but expressed concern that this method was not the intended approach. Suggestions included calculating the geometry incrementally for better understanding and using software like Mathematica for solving the equations. The user is seeking a more elegant solution to the problem, despite having already submitted their homework.
iroZn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



4barLinkage.gif


Tabulate and plot the angular position, velocity and acceleration of θ4 for t=0 to t=10 in increments of 0.1

r1= 30 mm
r2 = 12 mm
r3 = 39 mm
r4 = 36 mm

θ2 = 0.1t (radians)


The Attempt at a Solution



Well first I wrote this down:


r1 = r2cos(θ2) + r3cos(θ3) - r4cos(θ4)

It didn't really get me anywhere so after some research I found Freudenstein's Eqn:



K 1 cos θ 2 + K2 cos θ 5 + K 3 = cos ( θ 2 - θ 5 )

K1 = l1 / l4 K2 = l 1 / l 2 K3 = ( l 32 - l 12 - l 22 - l 2 4 ) / 2 l 2 l 4



Inputting the values I ended up with this:

(30/36)cosθ2 + (30/12)cosθ5 - (91/96) = cos(θ2 - θ5)

I have no idea how to solve this equation in terms of θ5 though!

(once I find θ5 I'll just use θ5 = 360 - θ4 to get θ4)





Am I doing this right at all? Any help would be soooooooo much appreciated!

Let me know if you need any more info or if I posted wrong or anything!
Thanks again!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
r2 and r4 have fixed points of rotation, but r3 is floating. Can you find a relationship concerning that the rotating ends of r2 and r4 have a fixed distance r3 between them?
Another approach is to let t=0.1 Are you then able to calculate the new geometry? Obviously, you could take days to slog through this 0.1 seconds at a time, but the process may indicate to you what you have to do to make it more general, and easier.
 
Yeah, well what I ended up doing is just throwing Freudenstein's eqn into Mathematica, have it solve it for θ5 and then just use that... it wasn't a pretty equation, but it seemed to have gotten the job done:

y = -cos^(-1)((160 cos^2(x)-582 cos(x)-2 sqrt(9216 sin^4(x)+49319 sin^2(x)+2816 sin^2(x) cos^2(x)-31520 sin^2(x) cos(x))+455)/(48 (4 sin^2(x)+4 cos^2(x)-20 cos(x)+25)))

(y is θ5, x is θ2)

Still this solution is obviously not how they wanted me to do it...

If anyone knows a more elegant way of solving this problem, I've already handed it in but I'd love to know how to do it!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top