Kinematics questions from a new physics student

AI Thread Summary
An object can indeed increase its speed while experiencing a decrease in acceleration, as illustrated by a car that continues to speed up even when the driver eases off the accelerator. Additionally, an object can have zero velocity and nonzero acceleration simultaneously, such as when an object moving left is accelerated to the right, momentarily stopping before changing direction. This demonstrates the nuanced relationship between velocity and acceleration in physics. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping kinematics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clear examples to illustrate these principles.
Intr3pid
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

I have a few conceptual questions about velocity and acceleration.

Can an object increase in speed as its acceleration decreases? If it does, can you guys give me an example?

Can an object have zero velocity and nonzero acceleration at the same time?
Also give some examples please

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To the first question:

Yes. Imagine that while driving a car, you push all the way down on the accelerator. Your car begins to speed up, gaining velocity. Now you slowly let off the accelerator a bit. You are still speeding up (your velocity is increasing), but your acceleration has decreased (you aren't speeding up as fast as before).

To the second:

Yes, but only for a split second. The only time I can think of this happening is in the following situation. Imagine an object moving to the left. If you start to accelerate this object to the right, it will move slower and slower to the left until for just a moment it is perfectly still (velocity is zero), and then it starts moving to the right. So you have kept a nonzero acceleration and it had to pass through a certain point where it had zero velocity.
 
Intr3pid, please do not post your questions in the tutorials section.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top