Kinematics - Two bodies revolving around each other question?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vckay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Kinematics
Vckay
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi. I am a newbie to the Physics forum. I am actually attempting to figure out a problem where there are two bodies forced to revolve around each other. The only constraints that would exist are the distance of separation between the two bodies is assumed to be constant. And there might be an initial angular velocity.
Intuitively I believe that if they are given initial equal angular velocities, the entire system will move in a straight line. And if they are having different angular velocities, the system will tend to spiral. Can anyone tell me if this is right?

Homework Equations



Here is where I get stuck...My initial attemp was to design parametric equations in the form :
x1(t)=x2(t)+Rcostheta1
y1(t)=y2(t)+Rcostheta1

x2(t)=x1(t)+Rcostheta2
y2(t)=y1(t)+Rcostheta2

Now both are simultaneously varying..I am confused as to how model the same..So any tips on as to whether I am on the right track or whether I have to consider acceleration also for them to maintain that distance of separation would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give a drawing? It's unclear to me now what you're talking about.
 
Vckay said:
The only constraints that would exist are the distance of separation between the two bodies is assumed to be constant. And there might be an initial angular velocity.
Intuitively I believe that if they are given initial equal angular velocities, the entire system will move in a straight line.

Here is where I get stuck...My initial attemp was to design parametric equations in the form :
x1(t)=x2(t)+Rcostheta1
y1(t)=y2(t)+Rcostheta1

x2(t)=x1(t)+Rcostheta2
y2(t)=y1(t)+Rcostheta2

Your physical intution seems to be right. The two bodies must be on a single line rotating about the center of mass of the system, so they will have the same angular velocity. You don't say whether the two have the same mass, but that does not alter this statement; it just means the center of mass isn't halfway between them. Also, since the forces the bodies exert on each other are equal and opposite, the net internal force on the system is zero. So the center of mass will move through space at a constant velocity.

What that means for your equations is the following:

1) the center of mass moves at constant velocity, so both bodies can have their positions referenced to that center;

2) the bodies will move at the same angular velocity, so a single angle \theta = \omega \cdot t can be used for both; thus

3) both bodies move on circles about the center of mass;

4) since the center of mass is not necessarily halfway between them, the two "orbital" circles may have different radii; and

5) since the two bodies are on "opposite sides" of the center of mass, the trig functions involved in their coordinates should have opposite signs.

So your equations will look more like, say:

x_1(t) = X(t) + R_1 cos(\omega t)
y_1(t) = Y(t) + R_1 sin(\omega t)

x_2(t) = X(t) - R_2 cos(\omega t)
y_2(t) = Y(t) - R_2 sin(\omega t)

I'll leave you to work out what the radii are, in terms of the masses of the bodies and how omega relates to the period of the system. You didn't say whether this is a gravitationally bound system (like, for instance, a simplest possible binary star), so I've ignored any connection to the accelerations here. These equations will be true for any attractive force in this idealized system.
 
Last edited:
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top