Kinematics: two dimensional motion, and vectors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's frustration with their physics teacher's inability to effectively teach two-dimensional motion and vectors. The student expresses difficulty understanding how to apply trigonometric functions to vector problems, especially using the coordinate method. A participant suggests searching for resources online, specifically recommending a helpful website on the topic. The student appreciates the assistance and emphasizes the need for clearer explanations from their teacher. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of learning physics without proper guidance.
stickchick596
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Alright. My physics teacher sucks. So if the class isn't already difficult enough, I have someone that can't teach it to me to make it harder. I just failed a quiz today, [?] I just know I did. Now, I need help. [?] Can someone give me a link, or explain to me how vectors in two dimensional motion work. I understand Trig functions, I passed Geometry [zz)] , but I need to know how and when to apply the functions to a vector problem that uses the coordinate method to solve. Thanks a bunch.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vectors in two dimensional motion sites

hi stickchick596:

If you want to find some sites involving two dimensional motion, just key in "vectors in two dimensional motion" and that should come up with some sites that deal with the subject. One site in particular that I thought might help is

http://www.wellesley.edu/Physics/phyllisflemingphysics/104_o_2dimmotion.html

I hope this will help clarify things for you.
 
WOW! thanks soooo much! If my teacher just explained this in the first place ( ) rather than assuming that we can just know physics, life would be so much easier! Thanks again!:smile:
 

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Thread 'Derivation of Hamilton's Principle: Questions'

I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Kinematics: A Complete Picture of Motion Without Causes
Replies
2
Views
2K
Prove Perpendicular Components of Motion are Independent
Replies
11
Views
5K
Energy and motion from ##R^6 \rightarrow R##
Replies
3
Views
911
Two-body equation of motion resolution
Replies
7
Views
2K
Constant acceleration kinematics
Replies
18
Views
2K
What is the difference between one-dimensional and two-dimensional motion?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Do we have "Newtonian space-time" in classical physics?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Projectile Motion: Path's length?
Replies
18
Views
3K
Kinematics, curvilinear motion (a couple of questions)
Replies
30
Views
2K
Projectile motion of a two-point rigid body
Replies
8
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top