- #36
protonman
- 285
- 0
The textbook answer is wrong and/or incomplete.robphy said:In my opinion, I think the original problem
"Why is KE not conserved in inelastic collisions?"
is not clearly posed since the original poster is obviously seeking for something deeper than the textbook definition [that an "inelastic collision" is one in which the total-KE is not conserved],
Can you please pose a clear question (possibly followed by what features you are looking for, or not looking for)?
[If "inelastic collision" means something other than the textbook definition, it would be helpful if you precisely define what YOU mean.]
A bit of advice. You don't know how much physics I have studied. I ask questions here to inspire discussion, not to get answers. This is the last place I would look for answers. If you want to test my understanding of the physics I have been discussing look at what I have said about SR. The best most people can do here is regurgitate their textbooks which is useless because anyone who can read can do the same. The whole point is to understand what the books are saying and then check if what they say is valid.