Kinetic Energy in Reference Frames

AI Thread Summary
The equation K'sys=1/2MtotalVcm2+1/2μVreli2 represents the total kinetic energy in a reference frame, with the first term accounting for the kinetic energy of the system's total mass at the center of mass velocity. Understanding the center of mass velocity is crucial, as it is frame-dependent and essential for conserving momentum within the system. The second term, involving μ, helps differentiate between various forms of kinetic energy, making calculations simpler. While there are multiple methods to analyze kinetic energy, this approach is favored for its clarity and efficiency. Overall, grasping these concepts is key to understanding kinetic energy in different reference frames.
aclark609
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
K'sys=1/2MtotalVcm2+1/2\muVreli2

I understand this equation represents the total kinetic energy in a reference frame. What I'm not getting out of this is the overall concept. I understand that the first part of the equation is supposed to represent the total kinetic energy required to conserve momentum in the system, but I don't know how.

In other words, how is taking the kinetic energy of the total mass of the system using the center of mass velocity equal to the energy needed to conserve momentum. Why would you use the total mass and the center of mass velocity? Perhaps I need to understand the concept of center of mass velocity a little better and it's purpose.

Same for the second part. Why would you use mu to find the kinetic energy that can be converted? Is it not possible to do it any other way? Perhaps this is the easiest?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
aclark609 said:
K'sys=1/2MtotalVcm2+1/2\muVreli2

I understand this equation represents the total kinetic energy in a reference frame. What I'm not getting out of this is the overall concept. I understand that the first part of the equation is supposed to represent the total kinetic energy required to conserve momentum in the system, but I don't know how.
How would you do it?

In other words, how is taking the kinetic energy of the total mass of the system using the center of mass velocity equal to the energy needed to conserve momentum. Why would you use the total mass and the center of mass velocity? Perhaps I need to understand the concept of center of mass velocity a little better and it's purpose.
Yes - it is not "center of mass velocity" but "the velocity of the center of mass" and it is frame-dependent.

Same for the second part. Why would you use mu to find the kinetic energy that can be converted? Is it not possible to do it any other way? Perhaps this is the easiest?
It is possible to do it in many different ways. This way distinguishes between different forms the energy takes so it makes the math easier.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top