Kinetic Energy in Rotational Motion Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a flywheel designed as a uniform solid disk. The user initially calculates the angular velocity using the maximum radial acceleration, resulting in an angular velocity of 52.6 rad/s. They then compute the moment of inertia as 122 kg*m^2 and apply it in the rotational kinetic energy formula, yielding an incorrect energy value of 1.68*10^5 J. The correct answer is identified as 8.42*10^4 J, which highlights the importance of including the factor of (1/2) in the moment of inertia formula for a disk, which is (1/2)mr^2. The user expresses frustration over repeated unsuccessful attempts to solve the problem.
itsme24
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Ok the problem is:

Energy is to be stored in a flywheel in the shape of a uniform solid disk with a radius of 1.30 m and a mass of 72.0 kg. To prevent structural failure of the flywheel, the maximum allowed radial acceleration of a point on its rim is 3600 m/s^2.

What I did was solve for the angular velocity through the radial acceleration:

3600m/s^2 = rw^2

w = 52.6 rad/s

Then I solved for the moment of inertia:

I = mr^2 = 72.0kg(1.30m)^2 = 122 kg*m^2

Finally I plugged it all into the rotational kinetic energy equation:

K = (1/2)(122m*m^2)(52.6rad/s)^2 = 1.68*10^5 J

The actual answer is 8.42*10^4, exactly half of what I got. I don't suppose someone could explain where the *(1/2) is coming from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The moment of inertia of a disk is?
 
hehe (1/2)mr^2
 
Energy is to be stored in a flywheel in the shape of a uniform solid disk with a radius of = 1.16m and a mass of 73.0 kg. To prevent structural failure of the flywheel, the maximum allowed radial acceleration of a point on its rim is 3510 m/s^2.

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE SOLVE THIS FFS IVE TRIED SO MANY OPTIONS AND ITS NOT WORKING!@@!_#!@#!@!@#)!@(#*)!@(#)((!@*
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top