How Does Ore Loading Affect Kinetic Energy and Momentum of a Car?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fusilli_Jerry89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinetic
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effects of ore loading on the kinetic energy and momentum of a car. When ore falls into an empty ore car, the kinetic energy remains unchanged because the horizontal velocity does not change, despite the increase in mass. However, the momentum of the loaded car increases, as the momentum is a product of mass and velocity, and the velocity ratio is related to the square root of the inverse ratio of the masses. The addition of ore affects momentum but not kinetic energy due to the direction of the forces involved. Understanding the vector directions is crucial to grasping these concepts.
Fusilli_Jerry89
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
An empty ore car coasts at a constant horizontal speed under an ore chute. Ore falls vertically into the car. What effect does the addition of the ore have on
(a) The kinetic energy of the loaded car? The book says the answer is the same as the unloaded car.

(b) The momentum of the loaded car? The book says: The ratio of the velocities is equal to the sqare root of the inverse ratio of the masses.

So there is more momentum but not more kinetic energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is and "ore" ?

HINT : check out the directions of the vectors in your question.

For example for (a) : the kinetic energy depends on mass and velocity. Mass stays the same and your velocity vector is horizontal because the car moves horizontally. So, given the fact that the velocity vector remains horizontal, how would it change even if some object falls on the car along the vertical direction ?

marlon
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top