Kinetic Energy of a Rotating Bar

AI Thread Summary
A thin, uniform bar weighing 12 kg and 2.00 m long rotates around one end, completing five rotations every three seconds. To find its kinetic energy, the bar is divided into infinitesimal segments, with the speed of each segment at distance r from the pivot calculated as V = (x*10*∏)/3. The kinetic energy of each segment is expressed as 0.5*(((x*10*∏)/3)^2)*dm, where dm is defined in terms of dx for integration. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly setting up the integration for calculating total kinetic energy, ultimately leading to a clearer understanding of the problem. The final realization simplifies the approach to solving the kinetic energy of the rotating bar.
student34
Messages
639
Reaction score
21

Homework Statement



A thin and uniform bar has a length of 2.00 m and weighs 12.0 kg. It is rotating from one end on a pivot 5 times every three seconds. What is its kinetic energy?

This is its hint: break the bar up into infinitesimal segments of mass dm and integrate to add up the kinetic energies of all of these segments.

Homework Equations



v = d/t = 20∏m/3s

Ek = 0.5*m*v^2

∫(12kg - 0kg)0.5*v^2dm


The Attempt at a Solution



∫(12kg - 0kg)0.5*v^2dm = (0.5(20∏/3)^3)/3 x 12 = 18374J

But I am way off because the answer is 877J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you seen the hint?
What is the speed of an element dm at distance r from the pivot?
What is its kinetic energy?
 
nasu said:
Have you seen the hint?

No, the hint is just in words.

What is the speed of an element dm at distance r from the pivot?

V = (x*10*∏)/3

What is its kinetic energy?

0.5*(((x*10*∏)/3)^2)*dm

This seems like more advanced calculus than we are expected to know because we usually have to integrate functions that have only one variable, and it's usually obvious in the function. Or am I not seeing an easier way.
 
No, you have only one variable, x.
You can write dm in terms of dx. Imagine the small mass element dm as a thin disk of thickness dx. The bar being uniform, of mass m and length L,
dm=(m/L)dx
 
nasu said:
No, you have only one variable, x.
You can write dm in terms of dx. Imagine the small mass element dm as a thin disk of thickness dx. The bar being uniform, of mass m and length L,
dm=(m/L)dx

Oh great, I finally get it, thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top