Kinetics and Reaction Rate: Cyclopropane Isomerization to Propene at 500°C

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kushal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rate
AI Thread Summary
Cyclopropane isomerizes to propene at 500°C, and the kinetics of this reaction were analyzed by measuring the volume of propene produced over time. To determine if the reaction is first order, it is essential to plot the experimental data correctly, focusing on the volume of propene rather than cyclopropane. A first-order reaction will exhibit a constant half-life, which can be verified through appropriate data plotting techniques. The linked resource provides guidance on how to plot the data to obtain a straight line if first-order kinetics are present. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately interpreting the reaction kinetics.
Kushal
Messages
438
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



cyclopropane isomerises to propene at a temperature of 500\circC. The kinetics of the reaction was studied by measuring the volume of propene formed at every minute. The results obtained were tabulated below:

Plot these experiemntal results graphically.

*please follow this link to see the graph:
2wf25ok.jpg


Use your graph to explain how the experimental results justify that the isomerisation is a fisrt order reaction.


The Attempt at a Solution



ok, i know that if the reaction is first order, the half life of the graph should remain constant.

the problem is that the graph is about the volume of propene formed and not of the volume of cyclopropane isomerising.

how should i verify that this reaction is first order?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Read through this page. http://www.science.uwaterloo.ca/~cchieh/cact/c123/rate.html In it, you will find information about a certain way to plot your data that should give you a straight line if your reaction exhibits first order kinetics.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top