Kirchoff's Current Law - Negative Current Value?

AI Thread Summary
Kirchoff's Current Law (KCL) was applied to analyze current flow at nodes A and B, resulting in negative current values for I2 and I4. The negative values indicate that the actual direction of current flow is opposite to the assumed positive direction. Current is confirmed to be a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction. The direction is determined by the chosen reference, represented by arrows in circuit diagrams. Understanding current as a vector helps clarify its behavior in circuit analysis.
waterchan
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
First of all, sorry for the poorly drawn figure.

In this figure, given are several conducting elements connecting by conducting wires, with the direction and amount of current flow indicated. I have to find the current across elements I1 through I4. When I apply Kirchoff's Current Law at node A (pointed to by the red arrow), I get:

Current entering node = Current leaving node
0 = I2 + 7A + 3A
I2 = -10A

Similarly, when I apply the law at node B (blue arrow), I get:

Current entering node = Current leaving node
2A = I4 + 4A
I4 = -2A

Am I doing something wrong, or is it possible for current to have a negative value depending on direction? In other words, can current be a vector quantity?

Thanks for regarding my dumb question.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.JPG
    circuit.JPG
    31.5 KB · Views: 1,781
Physics news on Phys.org
Sure, this means the current I4 is actually flowing towards node B. Current is always a vector quantity although in electronic circuits you don't need to bother with three-dimensional vectors, one dimension will do. The important thing is that is has a direction which is shown in the sign of the current. YOU have to specify the positive direction though, that's why there are arrows in the diagram. These arrows do not show the direction the current is flowing, but the positively oriented direction.
Current is exactly like velocity in this respect. (Current IS charge density times velocity).
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top