Kirchoffs current law. Someone check to make sure its correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Agnostic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on verifying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) using a circuit analysis involving currents Ia, Ib, Ic, and Id. It is established that in a series configuration, Ic and Id are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. The calculations show that if Ia is 3A and Ic is 1A, then Id must be -1A, leading to the conclusion that Ia equals Ib at 3A. However, an alternative analysis suggests that when applying KCL at a node with Ia and Ic entering and Ib leaving, the total current should equal 4A. The conversation confirms the correct application of KCL, highlighting the importance of consistent current direction and magnitude in circuit analysis.
Agnostic
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
In the picture.
 

Attachments

  • problem.PNG
    problem.PNG
    6 KB · Views: 498
Physics news on Phys.org
Due to the series configuration, Ic and Id are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.
if Ia = 3A, Ic = 1A, then Id = -1A
Ia + Ic - Id - Ib = 0
3A + 1A - 1A - Ib = 0
as a result, Ia=Ib = 3A
 
data1217 said:
Due to the series configuration, Ic and Id are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction.
if Ia = 3A, Ic = 1A, then Id = -1A
Ia + Ic - Id - Ib = 0
3A + 1A - 1A - Ib = 0
as a result, Ia=Ib = 3A


I agree with the Ic Id sign. However, Using the Node with Ia and Ic entering and Ib leaving and using KCL. I get Ia+Ic-Ib=0 therefore Ia+Ic=Ib or 3A + 1A =4A
 
Valhalla said:
I agree with the Ic Id sign. However, Using the Node with Ia and Ic entering and Ib leaving and using KCL. I get Ia+Ic-Ib=0 therefore Ia+Ic=Ib or 3A + 1A =4A

You are right.
for the node with Ib and Id entering, Ia leaving
-Ia + Ib + Id = 0
-3 + Ib + -1 = 0
Ib =4A
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top