Solving Kirchoff's Rules - Circuit Analysis Practice

  • Thread starter Thread starter jessedevin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit analysis problem using Kirchhoff's Rules. The user attempted to determine the current in each resistor and the potential difference across a 200-ohm resistor by setting up a system of equations. However, their calculated values for the currents and potential difference did not match the answers provided in the textbook. A key error identified was in the handling of voltage signs in the equation involving 40V and 360V, which should have been treated as additive since they are in series. Correcting this mistake would align the user's results with the textbook answers.
jessedevin
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the circuit of Figure P28.28, determine the current in each resistor and the potential difference across the 200-ohm resistor.
FigP28.28.jpg



Homework Equations



Kirchoff's Rules
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



The way I did it was like this:
FigP28.28d.jpg

I set up a system of equations-
I1 + I2 + I3 + I4 = 0
- 40 V = I2 (80Ω) - I1 (200Ω)
40 V - 360 V = I3 (20Ω) - I2 (80Ω)
- 360 V - 80 V = I4 (70Ω) - I3 (20Ω)

And I get
I1=1.83 (for 200Ω)
I2=4.07 (for 80Ω)
I3=.30 (for 20Ω)
I4=-6.2 (for 70Ω)
Then I do V=IR to get the potential difference, which I got was 366 volts.

But in the back of the book, it says the answers are:
1.00 A up in 200Ω
4.00 A up in 70 Ω
3.00 A up in 80 Ω
8.00 A down in 20 Ω
200 V

What did I do wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
40 V - 360 V = I3 (20Ω) - I2 (80Ω)
The signs on the 40V and the 360V should be the same because they are in series - the potentials add.
 
thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top