Kirchoff's Voltage Rule & Charged Capacitor Voltage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chemmjr18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
Kirchoff's Voltage Rule (KVL) can be applied to find the voltage across a charged capacitor, despite initial intuitiveness challenges. The principle states that the sum of the voltages around a closed loop must equal zero, which holds true for capacitors with one plate positive and the other negative. Applying KVL and Kirchoff's Current Law (KCL) consistently leads to accurate results in circuit analysis. Familiarity with the rules can be gained through practice and studying worked examples. Ultimately, evidence supports the validity of Kirchoff's Rules in electrical circuit calculations.
Chemmjr18
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Can I use Kirchoff's voltage rule to find the voltage across a charged capacitor? I don't really have a concrete.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Why would you think not? One plate is positive, the other equally negative, meaning the sum is zero.
 
Chemmjr18 said:
Can I use Kirchoff's voltage rule to find the voltage across a charged capacitor? I don't really have a concrete.
Do you have a specific circuit in mind?
 
Chemmjr18 said:
Can I use Kirchoff's voltage rule to find the voltage across a charged capacitor? I don't really have a concrete.
It may not be intuitive but if you apply KVL and KCL strictly, you get the right answer. Once you have found that it actually works, you may not find it so counter intuitive. Find some worked examples and go through them. There are zillions of hits at all sorts of levels if you search for Kirchoff RLC calculations.
Repetition gives familiarity gives acceptance eventually.
YE Gods! That reads like a religious doctrine. The difference is that there is evidence to prove this stuff.
 
  • Like
Likes Chemmjr18
Kirchoff's Rules

Indeed they do.
 
  • Like
Likes Chemmjr18
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top