Knowledge of the superposition of states

In summary, there is a possibility for a device to know about the superposition of states without collapsing it, by measuring a non-commuting observable. This has already been demonstrated by the Delft and Stony Brook experiments, where the supercurrent was detected flowing in both directions simultaneously. This is necessary for obtaining two separate states in a 2-slit experiment, as a single photon going through one slit or the other will not produce an interference pattern. Tony Leggett's topical review provides a thorough understanding of the complex issues surrounding quantum superposition, which is essential in fully comprehending quantum mechanics.
  • #1
Gerinski
Is it completely impossible, even in principle, that eventually there can be a device by which we could know about the superposition of states without collapsing it?
For example, being able to know that an atom is in a 30% probability of being unexcited and a 70% probability of being excited, without actually collapsing it in either of both states?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
But there ARE already!

All you need to do is measure a non-commuting observable. That's what the Delft and Stony Brook experiment did, by measuring the energy gap instead of the "current directions" in a superconducting junction.

From a previous thread:

ZapperZ said:
The SQUID experiments conducted recently at Stony Brook[1] and at Delft[2] CLEARLY showed a case where the supercurrent was flowing in BOTH DIRECTIONS simultaneously. It is the ONLY means to attain the two separate states. If the supercurrent is flowing either in one direction OR the other, the effect will NOT be detected.

The same can be said about a 2-slit experiment. It is a superposition of the path through BOTH slits simultaneously. This is the only means to get the interference pattern, implicating that a single photon is interfering with itself. A photon that goes through EITHER one slit or the other will NOT produce the identical interference pattern.

I have mentioned this reference before, but I highly recommend a topical review on this issue by Tony Leggett.[3] There is a huge, substantial but subtle issue that is involved here when discussing the Schrodinger Cat-type states. One cannot fully understand and appreciate QM without knowing and understanding the issues surrounding quantum superposition. When Feynman stated that when you understand the double-slit, you'll understand QM, this is exactly the principle he was referring to!

Zz.

[1] J.R. Friedman et al., Nature v.406, p.43 (2000).
[2] C.H. van der Wal et al., Science v.290, p.773 (2000).
[3] A.J. Leggett J. Phys: Cond. Matt. v.14, p.415 (2002).
 
Last edited:
  • #3


I cannot definitively say whether it is completely impossible or not for a device to be developed that can measure the superposition of states without collapsing it. However, based on our current understanding of quantum mechanics, it is highly unlikely that such a device could be created.

The principle of superposition states that a quantum system can exist in multiple states simultaneously until it is measured or observed, at which point it collapses into one of those states. This is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics and has been extensively tested and confirmed through experiments.

In order to measure the superposition of states without collapsing it, the device would need to interact with the system in a way that does not disturb or influence it in any way. This is a major challenge, as any interaction with the system, no matter how small, can cause it to collapse.

Additionally, the act of measuring itself involves the transfer of information, which can also cause the system to collapse. This is known as the measurement problem in quantum mechanics.

While it is always important to keep an open mind and continue exploring new possibilities, at this point in time, it seems highly unlikely that we will be able to know the superposition of states without collapsing it. However, advancements in technology and further research in quantum mechanics may one day lead to a better understanding of this phenomenon.
 

1. What is the superposition of states?

The superposition of states is a concept in quantum mechanics that describes the ability of a quantum system to exist in multiple states at the same time. This means that the system can exist in a combination of all possible states until it is observed or measured, at which point it collapses into a single state.

2. How does the superposition of states impact quantum computing?

The superposition of states is a crucial aspect of quantum computing as it allows for the parallel processing of information. By encoding information in quantum bits (qubits) that can exist in multiple states at once, quantum computers can perform certain calculations much faster than classical computers.

3. Can the superposition of states be observed in everyday life?

No, the superposition of states is a phenomenon that can only be observed on a tiny scale, such as at the atomic and subatomic levels. This is because larger objects are subject to classical physics, where objects can only exist in one state at a time.

4. How is the superposition of states related to the concept of entanglement?

Entanglement is another important concept in quantum mechanics that describes the correlation between two or more particles. When particles are entangled, they are in a state of superposition with each other, meaning that the state of one particle cannot be described independently of the other. This is often referred to as "spooky action at a distance."

5. What practical applications does the knowledge of the superposition of states have?

The superposition of states has many potential applications, such as in quantum computing, quantum cryptography, and quantum sensing. It also has implications for understanding the behavior of matter at the atomic level and could potentially lead to new technologies in the future.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
919
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
671
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
946
  • Quantum Physics
5
Replies
143
Views
6K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
596
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
997
  • Quantum Physics
4
Replies
124
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
233
Back
Top