I've been trying to express the Komar mass formula in component notation for a general static metric.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm finding that the expression for

[tex]

\nabla_c \xi_d

[/tex]

is reasonably simple, where [itex]\xi^{\mu}[/itex] is a timelike Killing vector, but the formula calls for

[tex]

\epsilon_{abcd} \nabla^c \xi^d

[/tex]

and this is very messy.

(We have to integrate the above two-form over some surface to get the mass and multiply by an appropriate constant).

Is it kosher to re-write the formula for the Komar mass as

[tex]

-\frac{1}{8 \pi} \int_S \epsilon^{abcd} \nabla_c \xi_d

[/tex]

and to do so, would I be expressing the surface to be integrated by one-forms rather than vectors?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Komar mass simplificiation

Loading...

Similar Threads for Komar mass simplificiation | Date |
---|---|

B Mass–energy equivalence: matter as potential energy? | Apr 4, 2018 |

I Can we deal with relativistic mass once and for all? | Mar 31, 2018 |

Quick question, Komar integral derivation in Wald | Apr 27, 2013 |

Newtonian generalization of Komar mass | Oct 4, 2010 |

Double potential energy paradox resolved by Komar mass | Nov 14, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**