Kudo list of well-written exchanges for the month of April :-D

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    List
AI Thread Summary
The discussion emphasizes the importance of clear and concise communication in astrophysics and cosmology, highlighting exemplary exchanges from April 2013. A specific question about why dark matter does not clump is raised, exploring the dynamics of dark matter particles and their gravitational interactions. It is noted that while momentum exchange occurs between dark matter particles, the effect is minimal, preventing significant clumping on smaller scales. The conversation encourages the sharing of similarly high-quality Q&A exchanges to foster clarity and understanding within the community. Overall, the thread serves as a platform to recognize and promote well-articulated scientific discussions.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
I've never done this before. Hope the parties involved are not embarrassed by being pointed out. I feel strongly about clarity of thought and writing in Astrophysics and Cosmology. Every once and a while I see a brief exchange that is exceptionally well written from both sides. Someone asks a thoughtful question very clearly and someone else answers it very accurately and clearly. No words wasted and no confusing loose ends. Nice.

Can anybody beat this, as an exemplary Q/A exchange for this month of April 2013? It is a really good question. Why doesn't darkmatter clump?
mrspeedybob said:
I understand there are no friction forces to slow it down but there are other means of dissipating kinetic energy.

Every time 2 dark matter particles come close enough to interact gravitationally there should be some exchange of momentum. If there is a cloud of dark matter particles, such as in and around a galaxy, there would be constant re-distribution of momentum. Each time a particle acquires enough momentum to escape the cloud the average momentum of the particles in the cloud is reduced. This would be a sort of evaporation that continually lowers the average temperature of the cloud. Cosmic expansion would create a difference between the amount of energy gained from incoming particles and that lost with outgoing particles. The result of all this should be small, dense, bodies of dark matter.

I understand that small, dense, non-luminous bodies have been ruled out as dark matter candidates. What prevents dark matter from behaving as I have suggested?

mfb said:
Every time 2 dark matter particles come close enough to interact gravitationally there should be some exchange of momentum.
Sure, but that momentum exchange is tiny. Gravitational attraction between individual particles is almost negligible. It is sufficient to give clumping on the scale of galaxies (where you have many particles interacting at the same time), but not on smaller scales within the current lifetime of the universe.

If you see another highquality efficient exchange like this during April in Astrophysics or Cosmology, I hope you will add it to this thread, as a kind of Kudo list. We'll see how good we are as a group, at asking and answering this sort of questions.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top