KVL Exercise: Basic Homework Statement & Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ammar w
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise Kvl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a KVL (Kirchhoff's Voltage Law) exercise where the user attempts to solve a circuit problem but encounters confusion regarding voltage signs in the circuit diagram. The user calculates voltages VR2 and V2 but questions the validity of their negative voltage results. It is clarified that the labeling of the circuit diagram is misleading, suggesting that the potential drop should be interpreted as a rise instead. The consensus is that the resistor's voltage should be labeled as "8V" rather than "-8V" to align with the correct interpretation of the circuit. Ultimately, the issue lies not in the user's understanding but in the circuit's labeling.
Ammar w
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Click on the link
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/2sb3i/yjim


Homework Equations


KVL Law
Similar Example :
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/2sb3i/orwa

The Attempt at a Solution


(a)
In the left loop :
-8-12+VR2 = 0
VR2 = -20 v

(b)
In the big loop :
-8-12+7-9-V2-3+VR1 = 0
-8-12+7-9-V2-3+1 = 0
V2 = -24

Why is my solution wrong?

If I take the right loop for (b) using the right answer for (a) :
-4+7-9-V2-3+1 = 0
V2 = -8 which is true.

Is the wrong with the negative voltage (-8) ??

thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ammar w said:
Is the wrong with the negative voltage (-8) ??

Yes, it looks like whoever created the circuit diagram created confusion when they labeled the leftmost resistor's potential drop. As it is marked, strictly speaking there should be a -8V potential drop across that resistor proceeding from bottom to top, which translates into a +8V potential rise as you've properly interpreted it. However, it would appear that they (confusingly) intended the "+ -" indicators to show the actual direction of the potential change of 8V.

Bottom line: assume that the "-8V" is really "8V" oriented according to the "+ -".
 
thank you
but I see that there is no difference if it was "+8" instead of "-8" ?
 
Ammar w said:
thank you
but I see that there is no difference if it was "+8" instead of "-8" ?

Um, how can it make no difference if you change the sign of a potential change?

For part (a) your equation summing the potential drops would become: +8-12+VR2 = 0
 
ok, how the solution of (a) will be if :
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/2sb3i/y0us
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ammar w said:
ok, how the solution of (a) will be if :
https://www.diigo.com/item/image/2sb3i/y0us

Just solve your equation that I presented in my previous post...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sorry
but can you tell me the equation of (a) if the potential change was "-8"?
I thought that the equation +8-12+VR2 = 0 is used when the potential change = -8.
 
Ammar w said:
I'm sorry
but can you tell me the equation of (a) if the potential change was "-8"?
I thought that the equation +8-12+VR2 = 0 is used when the potential change = -8.

Yes, that's right. The problem is not with your understanding, it's with the problem itself; the resistor is not labeled correctly for the given answers. The resistor should have its potential labeled as "8V", not "-8V", or alternatively, the + and - tags should be reversed.
 
aha
thank you Mr. gneill
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top