Optimizing Circuit Diagrams with Multiplexers: Eliminating Negations in Inputs

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vishera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Diagram
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on optimizing circuit diagrams using multiplexers, specifically addressing the challenge of eliminating negations in inputs. A key solution presented involves the expression x_3(¬x_2 + x_1) + ¬x_3x_2, which effectively utilizes multiplexers to invert signals without directly using negated logical variables. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding how multiplexers can manipulate inputs to achieve desired logical outcomes without negation. This approach is crucial for simplifying circuit designs in digital logic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of digital logic design principles
  • Familiarity with multiplexers and their functionality
  • Knowledge of Boolean algebra and logical expressions
  • Experience with circuit diagram representation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the operation and configuration of multiplexers in digital circuits
  • Explore Boolean algebra techniques for simplifying logical expressions
  • Learn about signal inversion methods in circuit design
  • Investigate practical applications of multiplexers in real-world digital systems
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and students in digital logic courses who are looking to enhance their understanding of circuit optimization techniques using multiplexers.

Vishera
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



2xAIGg0.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
kTJ63CD.jpg


The multiplexer that is closest to the top of the page has ~x3 as an input but I am not allowed to use the negation of a logical variable as an input. Any way to get rid of this negation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's tough to give you assistance on this without giving you too much of a clue.

Notice that the only way you can invert a signal is by using a multiplexer. Also, the solution I found is based on x_3(\bar{x}_2+x_1) + \bar{x}_3x_2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K