Lagrange multiplier for bose- Einstein stats

siresmith
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Why is -BEi used instead of +BEi as the lagrange multiplier for indistinguishable particles? How is it justified?

I've been reading a book about statistical mechanics and it introduces lagrange multipliers first for distinguishable particles- it has ln(ni) + a + BEi = 0.

(where a is alpha, B is beta, Ei is the energy)

The thing is, for the indistinguishable case, it has -BEi instead of BEi, so that it looks like ln () + a -BEi = 0. it goes on to show how this becomes the Boltzmann distribution is the number of levels,g, is much greater than the number of particles, n. But it seems that this only works if you have -BE rather than +BE.

So it looks like some sort of ad hoc measure to make things work. don't get it, is there a reason that its - instead of +?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
.The reason for the use of -BEi instead of +BEi as the lagrange multiplier for indistinguishable particles is because a negative sign is required to ensure that the probability of each state is positive. This is due to the fact that the energy levels of indistinguishable particles tend to be strongly degenerate; that is, they have more than one particle in the same state. Therefore, if the lagrange multiplier was positive, then the probability of each state would be zero, which is not desirable. Therefore, the negative sign is used to ensure that the probability of each state is positive.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top