Lagrange's Theorem (Order of a group) Abstract Algebra

anna010101
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someones tells me how to prove these theorems.
1. Prove that if G is a group of order p^2 (p is a prime) and G is not cyclic, then a^p = e (identity element) for each a E(belongs to) G.

2. Prove that if H is a subgroup of G, [G:H]=2, a, b E G, a not E H and b not E H, then ab E H.

3. Verify that S4 has at least one subgroup of order k for ech divisor of 24

4. If H is a subgroup of G and [G:H] = 2, the the right cosets of H in G are the same as the left cosets of H in G. Why?

5. Prove that if H is a subgroup of a finite grup G, the n the number of right cosets of H in G equals the number of left cosets of H in G.

Also, does anyone know a good website that has good information for abstract algebra. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Prove ... a^p = e
Well, what else could that exponent be?

2. Prove that if H is a subgroup of G, [G:H]=2, a, b E G, a not E H and b not E H, then ab E H.
If you're only worried about whether or not something is in H... then why don't you work with G/H instead? (You know H is normal, right? If not, then see #4)

3. Verify that S4 has at least one subgroup of order k for ech divisor of 24
Just start writing down subgroups. I don't know what else to say.

4. If H is a subgroup of G and [G:H] = 2, the the right cosets of H in G are the same as the left cosets of H in G. Why?
You should know a very simple description of the left and right cosets of H. (Start by counting them -- you know how many there are)

5. Prove that if H is a subgroup of a finite grup G, the n the number of right cosets of H in G equals the number of left cosets of H in G.
Count. If you don't know what to count, then count everything you can imagine, in as many different ways as you can imagine.
 
check my website.

or those of james milne, robert ash, ruslan sharipov, or just google your desired topic.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top