Lagrangian and eulerian descriptions of phenomena

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fisico30
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Phenomena
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions of physical phenomena, particularly in the context of fluid mechanics and differential equations. Participants explore the advantages and applications of each viewpoint, as well as their equivalence in certain scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that differential equations can be expressed from both a field perspective and a particle perspective, with the Navier-Stokes equations derived from Newton's second law applied to a particle.
  • One participant argues that the Lagrangian viewpoint involves observing fluid flow through a control volume, while the Eulerian viewpoint focuses on the deformation of a fluid element over time.
  • Another participant suggests that the Eulerian description is preferred in continuum mechanics for its natural representation of momentum and energy transfer.
  • There is a question raised about the definitions of the two viewpoints, with some confusion expressed regarding which perspective corresponds to which name.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and applications of the Lagrangian and Eulerian perspectives, indicating that there is no consensus on the matter. Some participants agree on the equivalence of the two viewpoints, while others highlight the specific advantages of each in different contexts.

Contextual Notes

There is some ambiguity in the definitions of the Lagrangian and Eulerian perspectives, with participants expressing uncertainty about which viewpoint corresponds to which description. This may affect the clarity of the discussion.

fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
lagrangian and eulerian descriptions of phenomena...

hello everyone,

some differential equations are written in terms of a field perspective, some from the point of view of a particle moving through the field...
Navier-stokes eqns can be derived from Newton' s 2nd law applied to a particle.

What advantage is there in viewing things from a particle point of view( Lagrangian view)?
I guess classica mechanics is based on this view.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The two viewpoints are equivalent, but some problems are easier to write down in one particular choice of coordinates. For example, if you want to describe the flow of fluid through a channel, IIRC the Lagrangian viewpoint means you pick a control volume dV and watch the fluid flow through it (i.e. stand on the river bank and watch a static point in space), while the Eulerian view means you choose a fluid element dv and watch it deform over time (i.e. follow a material point in time).

In continuum mechanics, especially fluid mechanics, the Eulerian description is preferred because it's a more natural way to describe how deformation and flow carry momentum and energy, by using the total derivative D/Dt =\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + v\bullet \nabla.
 


Isn't it the other way around? Euler stays put, while Lagrange moves around with the particle?
 
I found that connector you were looking for

I found that connector you were looking for
Cindy, is this the thing you were looking for?
www.liangdianup.com/computeraccessories_1.htm[/URL]

It's on the list of computer accessories and parts. They have the DVI video thing to convert that jap monitor to work with your other computer. Just about any other kind of wire adaptor, usb connectors, monitor extension wires, ps2 extention wires, and all kinds of female and male swap connectors and things that I think would help your shop. If that above link don't work then goto [url]www.lducompany.com[/url] and click on computer accessories. Let me know if that is what you need and give me your email address again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Heirot said:
Isn't it the other way around? Euler stays put, while Lagrange moves around with the particle?

It could be- I always forget which is which :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K