Lagrangian Dynamics, calculating virtual force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating generalized forces in a Lagrangian Dynamics setup involving two bodies connected by a prismatic joint. The user is uncertain whether to treat the prismatic joint as stiff while calculating generalized forces for one coordinate, specifically the position of b1, or to consider the actual forces present in the system. They express confusion about whether forcing other coordinates to be stiff introduces unnecessary forces that could complicate the analysis. Ultimately, they conclude that maintaining the stiffness of other generalized coordinates while varying one at a time is the correct approach for determining virtual work. This highlights a common challenge in applying Lagrangian methods to dynamic systems with constraints.
alanic
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm very happy that I found this forum, hello everyone.
I'm studying Lagrangian Dynamics and I can't figure out how to find the generalized forces in a setup like this:

Code:
   ____             ____
  |    |    ___    |    |
  | b1 |===|___|===| b2 |
  |____|           |____|

--->x

b1 and b2 are corrected with a prismatic joint that has a motor so it can apply force on the two bodies along the joint. It can also be loose, in which case it won't apply any force and the joint will move in and out freely. b1 and b2 are restricted to move only along the x axis, which is the axis of the joint. Arbitrary external forces can be applied to both bodies. I choose generalized coordinates as the position of b1 (x_b1) and the length of the prismatic joint (l).

Now I would like to find the generalized forces for the generalized coordinates I chose. When doing that, I should take each generalized coordinate one by one and assume there is a small variation on that generalized coordinate. Then I should see how much work is done by the forces in the system. My question is, when finding the generalized force for x_b1, should I assume that the prismatic joint is stiff? It seems like what needs to be done since I should only allow x_b1 to vary. But, at the same time, this would require me to consider a force transfer between the two bodies(wouldn't it?), even though there was no force on the prismatic joint. So, for example, if b1 and b2 had forces that are equal and opposite to each other and if I assume the joint to be stiff, there will be no virtual work done for x_b1. This feels wrong.

So I guess I'm a little confused about the procedure to calculate the generalized forces. Should I allow only one generalized coordinate at a time, force all others to be stiff (which would introduce extra forces that are not there, like the ones that I would need to make the prismatic joint stiff), and consider that setup to find the virtual work for that generalized coordinate? Or should I consider all the forces that are really there and not force the other generalized coordinates to be stiff? Or, does the idea of "not allowing other generalized coordinates to vary" not really make them stiff and do I consider the existing forces like in a normal general body diagram?

Thanks for reading about my confusion. I think I'm missing some fundamental principle here. Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok some careful math analysis showed that I should keep the other generalized coordinates absolutely stiff and solve the whole system by varying one generalized coordinate at a time.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top