Lagrangian for a rheonomic constraint?

AI Thread Summary
In systems with rheonomic constraints, the Lagrangian can still be derived using the standard approach, as long as the constraint is holonomic and the forces are conservative. The Lagrangian takes the form L = T - V, where T is kinetic energy and V is potential energy, and may include a time-dependent term, L(q, q', t). This time-dependent term does not alter the application of the Euler-Lagrange equation. Therefore, time should be treated as a generalized coordinate when using the equation. Overall, the presence of a rheonomic constraint does not fundamentally change the derivation process.
adartsesirhc
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
How does a Lagrangian change for a system with a rheonomic constraint? As far as I can see in the derivations, it shouldn't seem to matter, but I just want to make sure.

And if I have a rheonomic constraint, what should I do with the time? Should I just ignore it and use the Euler-Lagrange equation normally, or should I treat it is a generalized coordinate?

thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
in fact we can obtain every thing from the process of the derivation of the Euler-Lagrange equation.
as long as the constraint is a holonomic constraint,and the F is conservative(so F=V's derivative),the L is T-V.
and the follow things have no differences with the situations which have no such rheonomic constraint,except that there may be a time-concerned term,that is L=L(q,q',t),but this term won't affect us to use the Euler-Lagrange equation
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top