A Lagrangian Multipliers with messy Solution

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mishal0488
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around applying Lagrangian multipliers to a mechanical system involving kinetic and potential energy equations alongside a holonomic constraint. The user has derived four equations corresponding to each coordinate but is uncertain about the next steps in solving them. They mention the challenge of handling squared terms that lead to two equations when isolating a variable. The user seeks assistance in developing the system of equations further, with the intention of using the Runge-Kutta method for simulation. The conversation highlights the complexities of Lagrangian mechanics, particularly for those with limited formal training in the subject.
Mishal0488
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
Hi Guys

Please refer to the attached file.
I have not included any of the derivatives or partial derivatives as it does get messy, I just just included the kinetic and potential energy equations and the holonomic constraint.

The holonomic constraint can be considered using Lagrange multipliers. The result is 4 equations, one for each coordinate and the holonomic constraint.

I am not sure what to do once I am at this point, can someone please assist?
With regards to the holonomic constraint, I can make one of the variables the subject of the formula, however due to the squared terms there are two equations which will arise.

Kind regards
Mishal Mohanlal
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
look like a known problem in solid state physics but i am not able to remember it now did you try matrix method for differential equations
 
Why solid state physics? The image is a mechanical system which I am trying to simulate.

Note that I am an engineer and my understanding of Lagrangian mechanics is limited since it is not taught as part of engineering. I have learned through self study.

I was hoping to develop the system of equations and thereafter solve it using Runge Kutta
 
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top