Solving Problem 1.8: Angular Momentum Conservation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around Problem 1.8 from Goldstein's mechanics, which involves a system of three particles with specific forces and potentials. The Lagrangian derived for the system is presented, incorporating both the potential and kinetic energy terms. There is uncertainty regarding the conservation of angular momentum, with the initial thought being that it should be conserved due to the absence of external torque. The conversation suggests using Noether's theorem to analyze the Lagrangian's behavior under rotations, although the theorem has not yet been covered in the text. The participants are seeking guidance on how to approach the calculations necessary to confirm or refute angular momentum conservation.
Peeter
Messages
303
Reaction score
3
Problem 1.8 from a Goldstein's mechanics text, is (verbatim since it's hard to describe otherwise) :

"A system is composed of three particles of equal mass m.
Between any two of them there are forces derivable from a potential

<br /> V = -g e^{-\mu r}<br />

where r is the disance between the two particles. In addition, two of the
particles each exert a force on the third which can be
obtained from a generalized potential of the form

<br /> U = -f \mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{r}<br />

\mathbf{v} being the relative velocity of the interacting particles
and f a constant. Set up the Lagragian for the system, using as coordinates the
radius vector \mathbf{R} of the center of mass and the two vectors

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> \boldsymbol{\rho}_1 &amp;= \mathbf{r}_1 - \mathbf{r}_3 \\<br /> \boldsymbol{\rho}_2 &amp;= \mathbf{r}_2 - \mathbf{r}_3<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Is the total angular momentum of the system conserved?"

For the Lagrangian I get:

<br /> \mathcal{L} =<br /> g \left( <br /> e^{-\mu \left\vert{\boldsymbol{\rho}_1}\right\rvert} <br /> + e^{-\mu \left\vert{\boldsymbol{\rho}_2}\right\rvert} <br /> + e^{-\mu \left\vert{ \boldsymbol{\rho}_1 - \boldsymbol{\rho}_2 }\right\rvert} \right)<br /> + f \left(\mathbf{R} - \frac{1}{3}(\boldsymbol{\rho}_1 + \boldsymbol{\rho}_2) \right) \cdot \left( \dot{\boldsymbol{\rho}_1} + \dot{\boldsymbol{\rho}_2} \right)<br />

For the part about the angular momentum conservation I'm not as sure. Since there is no external torque on the system I think that the angular momentum is conserved.

However, perhaps the idea of the problem is to show this explicitly given the Lagrangian. It's not clear to me an effective approach to do so though, as this looks like a messy calculation, and I haven't actually tried doing so.

Does anybody have any hint (which could be "suck it up, and do the calculations") for me if there is a way to show or disprove the momentum part of the question if the answer isn't just "there is no external torque".
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Noether's theorem: How does the lagrangian transform under rotations?
 
Thanks for the tip Count. Noether's theorem hasn't been covered yet in the text, but I'll take a look forward (and/or in David Tong's online dynamics pdf).
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top