Landing a Spacecraft: Understanding Gravity in Space

AI Thread Summary
Spacecraft do not truly come to rest in space; they maintain high speeds while in orbit to avoid falling into celestial bodies. To achieve stable orbits, spacecraft shed excess velocity using retro-rockets or other propulsion systems, often employing gravity assists to optimize fuel efficiency. Geostationary satellites orbit the Earth at the same rotational speed, appearing stationary from the surface. When approaching other celestial bodies, such as the Moon, spacecraft fire rockets backward to reduce speed for orbital insertion. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for successful spacecraft navigation and landing.
emma149
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how do space ships come to rest when they get into space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
emma149 said:
how do space ships come to rest when they get into space?

Rest with respect to what?
 
Are you thinking of geo-stationary orbits ? Or 'entering' the L4/L5 halo positions ? Taking up Mercury or Mars orbit ??

To 'get there', you need relative velocity, then you must shed that excess velocity with Retro-rockets or whatever you want to call the payload's final propulsion system. To minimise fuel use, spacecraft may use gravity assists, a diminishing succession of elliptical orbits with sparing thrust at critical time, ion thruster or aero-braking...

A really careful trajectory that uses planetary gravity to sling-shot probes can easily double or treble the available payload...
 
emma149 said:
how do space ships come to rest when they get into space?

The short answer is that they don't really come to rest when in space. Like roller coasters without brakes they are (by intention of the designers) always moving (actually, free falling) with fairly great speed "around" the body they orbit so that they won't "fall into" the body.

In case you are thinking of geo-stationary satellites, as Nik mentions, you should know that such satellites are in fact orbiting the Earth, they just do so at exactly the same rate as the Earth rotates, so when you view one from the surface of Earth the satellite appears to just hang there (see [1]). Its like a child sitting on a merry-go-round watching her (fairly athletic) dad running along on the ground just outside with his video camera keeping up with the rotation of the merry-go-round; the man is not moving relative to the view of his child even though he is running like mad over the ground.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit
 
with respect to the moon.
 
welcome to pf!

hi emma! welcome to pf! :smile:
emma149 said:
with respect to the moon.

the usually fire their rockets "backwards" on the way to the Moon, to reduce their speed relative to the Moon, and then again on the other side of the Moon, to make the orbit circular

see eg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_8#Lunar_sphere_of_influence" :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
12K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top