Laplace time differentiation property

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the time differentiation property of the Laplace transform, specifically the equation dx(t)/dt = sX(s). Participants suggest starting with the Laplace transform definition and discuss the treatment of terms in the integral, particularly how to handle the first term that should vanish. The Final Value Theorem is mentioned as a potential method to show this vanishing behavior. There is also confusion regarding the integration limits, with a clarification that they are typically from 0 to +∞, although an alternative definition from -∞ to +∞ is noted. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on definitions and proper application of theorems in the proof.
khdani
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm trying to prove the time differentiation property of Laplace transform.
dx(t)/dt = sX(s)


http://img10.imageshack.us/img10/290/tlaplace.jpg http://g.imageshack.us/img10/tlaplace.jpg/1/

how do i continue from here ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what the first step here is supposed to represent. Wouldn't the first thing to do be to write

L[dx/dt] = ...


And then use the definition of the Laplace transform?
 
yes, you right
the first term should be like you said
but what i have to do with the first term of the last part?
it should vanish but i don't know how? maybe by Final Value Theorem ?
 
In the final integral, t is the variable of integration.

Take any term that is independent of t outside of the integral, and see what you get.

p.s. your integration limits are wrong.
 
the final integral is sX(s)
but the one before should vanish somehow..., i think it's because of Final Value Theorem
why do you think the integration limits are wrong?
 
khdani said:
the final integral is sX(s)
Yes, good.

... but the one before should vanish somehow..., i think it's because of Final Value Theorem
why do you think the integration limits are wrong?

It looks like there are two definitions of the Laplace transform:
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LaplaceTransform.html

The integrations limits are usually taken from 0 to +∞, but maybe your class is using the -∞ to +∞ definition instead. I didn't know about that definition before.

If the limits are 0 to +∞, you can just evaluate the x(t) e-st term at the limits. I'm not sure what to do if you're using the -∞ definition though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top