Laplace Transform - Sigma+jw | Control Theory Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physical significance of the complex variable sigma + jω in the context of the Laplace transform and control theory. Sigma represents the real part, indicating system stability and exponential growth or decay, while ω represents the imaginary part, associated with oscillatory behavior and frequency response. For example, if sigma equals 4 and omega equals 5 rad, it suggests a system with a specific growth rate and oscillation frequency. Understanding these components helps in analyzing system dynamics and response characteristics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of these parameters in control theory applications.
shankarnus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys..:)

I have a doubt regarding laplace transform.
can anyone tel me... what is the physical significance of sigma+jw in it...?
what interpretations we can make from sigma and jw in control theory...?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, do you mean this?

\sigma + j \omega

Here, \sigma is the real part and \omega is the imaginary part of a complex number...
 
First thank u soo much for ur kind reply...:)

ya the same...i need to know the physical significance of it...:)

for why we r goin for it...:)
 
k...if sigma=4 and then omega=5 rad..

then wat we can say from it...? wat does it indicate
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top