Laplace Transform - Sigma+jw | Control Theory Explained

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the physical significance of the complex variable sigma + jω in the context of the Laplace transform and control theory. Sigma represents the real part, indicating system stability and exponential growth or decay, while ω represents the imaginary part, associated with oscillatory behavior and frequency response. For example, if sigma equals 4 and omega equals 5 rad, it suggests a system with a specific growth rate and oscillation frequency. Understanding these components helps in analyzing system dynamics and response characteristics. The conversation emphasizes the importance of these parameters in control theory applications.
shankarnus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys..:)

I have a doubt regarding laplace transform.
can anyone tel me... what is the physical significance of sigma+jw in it...?
what interpretations we can make from sigma and jw in control theory...?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, do you mean this?

\sigma + j \omega

Here, \sigma is the real part and \omega is the imaginary part of a complex number...
 
First thank u soo much for ur kind reply...:)

ya the same...i need to know the physical significance of it...:)

for why we r goin for it...:)
 
k...if sigma=4 and then omega=5 rad..

then wat we can say from it...? wat does it indicate
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top