Laplace transformation: system of DE

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a system of differential equations involving three functions, \(y_1\), \(y_2\), and \(y_3\), defined by the equations \(y_1' + y_1 = y_2\), \(y_2' + 5y_2 = y_3\), and \(y_3' + y_3 = f\), with initial conditions set to zero. The objective is to express \(Y_1(s)\) in terms of \(F(s)\) using Laplace transforms.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about how to manipulate the system of equations to eliminate \(y_2\) and \(y_3\). Some suggest using substitution to derive a single equation for \(y_1\). Others propose developing the equations for the Laplace transforms \(Y_1\), \(Y_2\), and \(Y_3\) as a standard method for solving such systems.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different methods to approach the problem. Some participants have suggested specific transformations and substitutions, while others are questioning the notation and the implications of the initial conditions. Guidance has been offered regarding the need to express \(Y_1\) in terms of \(F\), but no consensus has been reached on the final form of the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify values for the derivatives of \(y\) at \(t=0\), which may affect the application of the Laplace transform. There is also a mention of the need to find the other \(Y_i\)s, indicating that the discussion is still in progress.

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


Let ##y_1^{'}+y_1=y_2##, ##y_2^{'}+5y_2=y_3##, ##y_3^{'}+y_3=f## and ##y_1(0)=y_2(0)=y_3(0)=0##. Find ##Y_1(s)## in terms of ##F(s)##.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am completely lost here. I tried to rewrite the system so that I would somehow get rid of ##y_2## and ##y_3## but that didn't really work out well. I don't know what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skrat said:

Homework Statement


Let ##y_1^{'}+y_1=y_2##, ##y_2^{'}+5y_2=y_3##, ##y_3^{'}+y_3=f## and ##y_1(0)=y_2(0)=y_3(0)=0##. Find ##Y_1(s)## in terms of ##F(s)##.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am completely lost here. I tried to rewrite the system so that I would somehow get rid of ##y_2## and ##y_3## but that didn't really work out well. I don't know what to do.

Let ##Y_i(s)## be the Laplace transform of ##y_i(t),## for ##i = 1,2,3##. Develop and solve the equations for ##Y_1, Y_2, Y_3##. (That is one of the standard methods for dealing with constant-coefficient linear DE systems.)
 
Last edited:
skrat said:

Homework Statement


Let ##y_1^{'}+y_1=y_2##, ##y_2^{'}+5y_2=y_3##, ##y_3^{'}+y_3=f## and ##y_1(0)=y_2(0)=y_3(0)=0##. Find ##Y_1(s)## in terms of ##F(s)##.

I am completely lost here. I tried to rewrite the system so that I would somehow get rid of ##y_2## and ##y_3## but that didn't really work out well. I don't know what to do.

Looks to me like you have to follow down the line:
if:
##y_{1}' +y_{1} = y_{2}##
and ##y_{2}' + 5y_{2} = y_{3}##
then via substitution:

##(y_{1}' + y_{1})' + 5(y_{1}' + y_{1}) = y_{1}'' + (y_{1}' + 5y_{1}') + y_{1} = y_{3}##
follow this logic and I believe you will get your answer.
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Looks to me like you have to follow down the line:
if:
##y_{1}' +y_{1} = y_{2}##
and ##y_{2}' + 5y_{2} = y_{3}##
then via substitution:

##(y_{1}' + y_{1})' + 5(y_{1}' + y_{1}) = y_{1}'' + (y_{1}' + 5y_{1}') + y_{1} = y_{3}##
follow this logic and I believe you will get your answer.

Doing so brings me to:

##y_1^{'''}+7y_1^{''}+11y_1^{'}+5y_1=f##

Now I am guessing that all that still has to be done is:
##Y_1^{'''}(s)+7Y_1^{''}(s)+11Y_1^{'}(s)+5Y_1(s)=F(s)##

And that's it?
 
Well, that's what I was thinking, but I didn't really pay much attention to your notation at the beginning, is
##y_{1}## really ##y_{1}(t)## ?
If that's the case then I guess they want (as previously mentioned) the Laplace transform of ##y_{1}## in terms of the Laplace transform of F. (judging by F(s)).
If by F you mean f and Y you mean y, then yes I would say that that answer would suffice.
 
I'm only just learning about Laplace Transforms currently myself. Sorry if these posts weren't much help
 
Hmmm,

BiGyElLoWhAt, your idea works but not so fast. :D

The problem is that ##f^{(n)}(t)=s^nF(s)-\sum_{k=1}^{n}s^{k-1}f^{(n-k)}(0)## but the problem says nothing about the value of ##y^{'}##...

So like Ray said, I firstly have write each equation with laplace transformation and than apply your idea which brings me to:

##Y_1(s)[s^3+7s^2+11s+5]=F(s)##

Is this the final result?
 
skrat said:
Hmmm,

BiGyElLoWhAt, your idea works but not so fast. :D

The problem is that ##f^{(n)}(t)=s^nF(s)-\sum_{k=1}^{n}s^{k-1}f^{(n-k)}(0)## but the problem says nothing about the value of ##y^{'}##...

So like Ray said, I firstly have write each equation with laplace transformation and than apply your idea which brings me to:

##Y_1(s)[s^3+7s^2+11s+5]=F(s)##

Is this the final result?

That is almost done (and correct). You haven't finished solving for ##Y_1## in terms of ##F## until you divide both sides by that polynomial in ##s##. If your ultimate goal is to finish solving by inverting the ##Y_i##, you would want to leave the polynomial in ##s## in factored form. Also don't you need to find the other ##Y_i\text{'s}##?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K