Solve Laplace's Equation for Square in XY Plane w/BCs

  • Thread starter Thread starter stunner5000pt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laplace's equation
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Consider a square in the XY plane with corners at (0,0, (a,0), (a,a,) and (0,a). There is no charge nor matter inside the square. The sides perpendicular to the Y axis have potential zero. The side at x=a has constant potentail V0. The side at x=0 has potentail -V0. Find V(x,y) at all points inside the square.

Homework Equations


Laplace's equaton in rectangular coordinates in 2 dimensions

\frac{d^2 V}{dx^2} + \frac{d^2 V}{dy^2} = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


Boundary conditions are
1. V=0, y=a
2. V=0, y=0
3. V=V0, x= a
4. V=-V0, x=0

By separation of variables
V(x,y) = = X(x) Y(y) = (Ae^{kx} + Be^{-kx}) (C\cos ky + D\sin ky)

using conditon 3, C=0
using condition 4, k = n\pi / a
Now there is a symmetry such that V(0,y) = -V(a,y)

so then A = - B, and
X(x) = e^{kx} - e^{-kx} = 2 \sinh kx

SO then the potential is
V(x,y) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} C_{n} \sinh\left(\frac{n\pi x}{a}\right) \sin\left(n\pi y}{a}\right)

The Cn coefficients are simply 4V_{0}/n \pi if n is odd otherwise if n is even Cn is zero

now V(0,y) = -V(a,y)
V(x,y) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} C_{n} \sinh\left(n\pi \right) \sin\left(n\pi y}{a}\right) = V_{0}<br /> V(0,y) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} C_{n} \sinh(0) \sin\left(n\pi y}{a}\right) =-V_{0}<br /> <br /> but sinh (0) = 0 ... the argument for the sinh must be wrong<br /> <br /> i know sinh is odd function so somehow the argumet of sinh when x= 0 must be equal to the negative of argument of sinh when x = a<br /> <br /> do i simply have to guess this?? Or is there a more step by step approach??<br /> <br /> i was guessing the argument should be something like this<br /> <br /> n\pi (\frac{x}{a} + q)<br /> when x = a, the argument is positive<br /> n\pi (1+q) = n\pi<br /> n\pi (q) = n \pi<br /> <br /> q should be -1 but then in the first case the argumetn becomes zero. So we put a 2 in front of that fraction<br /> <br /> n\pi (\frac{2x}{a} -1)<br /> but the textbook says there should be an additional factor of 1/2.. that is<br /> <br /> \frac{n\pi}{2} (\frac{2x}{a} -1)<br /> how did they get that?? <br /> <br /> Thanks for help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
so then A = - B, and
X(x) = e^{kx} - e^{-kx} = 2 \sinh kx
Look at this again. That symetry argument applies for V(-a,y)=-V(a,y). Is that what you have here?
 
LeonhardEuler said:
Look at this again. That symetry argument applies for V(-a,y)=-V(a,y). Is that what you have here?


ahh no i have -V(0,y) = V(a,y)

so then the argment of the exponential has to change as well??
such that at 0 the argument turns to -a??

something along these lines??
 
stunner5000pt said:
ahh no i have -V(0,y) = V(a,y)

so then the argment of the exponential has to change as well??
such that at 0 the argument turns to -a??

something along these lines??

No, I would abandon the symetry argument altogether and deal with the boundary conditions individually.
 
LeonhardEuler said:
No, I would abandon the symetry argument altogether and deal with the boundary conditions individually.

ok abandoning the symmetry argument

then we get tow equation

A + B = -V_{0}
Ae^{n\pi} + Be^{-n\pi} = V_{0}

iget

A = V_{0} \frac{1 + e^{-n\pi}}{2\sinh n\pi}
B= -V_{0} \frac{1+ e^{n\pi}}{2\sinh n\pi}

X(x) = V_{0} \frac{1 + e^{-n\pi}}{2\sinh n\pi}-V_{0} \frac{1+ e^{n\pi}}{2\sinh n\pi} = \frac{V_{0}e^{\frac{n\pi x}{a}}}{2\sinh n\pi} (e^{-n\pi} - e^{n\pi})

but
e^{-n\pi} - e^{n\pi} = -2\sinh n\pi
so
X(x) = -\frac{V_{0}}{2} e^{\frac{n\pi x}{a}}

i get a feeling i did something wrong somehwere but i am unable to track the error...
 
1. V=0, y=a
2. V=0, y=0

The yBC could imply no dependence, i.e. the function of y=1, which means the solution is a function of x only. The BC also imply an even function about a/2.

3. V=V0, x= a
4. V=-V0, x=0

The xBC imply an odd function about a/2, e.g. A sin kx or A sinh kx (or Aekx - A e-kx. There are two unknowns A and k which can be solved using the BC.
 
Astronuc said:
1. V=0, y=a
2. V=0, y=0

The yBC could imply no dependence, i.e. the function of y=1, which means the solution is a function of x only. The BC also imply an even function about a/2.

3. V=V0, x= a
4. V=-V0, x=0

The xBC imply an odd function about a/2, e.g. A sin kx or A sinh kx (or Aekx - A e-kx. There are two unknowns A and k which can be solved using the BC.

i got it now... my solution wold have worked if the square was centered about the origin. But in this case we needed to 'shift' the solution suhc that it conforms with our symmetry
 
Back
Top