Large parallel slashes through topography

  • Thread starter Thread starter maze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation of large, parallel "slashes" in the topography of Utah, which appear to be extensive linear features cutting through natural landscapes, including river valleys. Participants speculate on the geological causes of these formations, suggesting they could be the result of igneous dykes or faults. The regularity of the patterns raises questions about their formation, with some leaning towards the idea that they are faults due to the absence of visible displacement. The conversation also touches on the nature of geological dykes, explaining that they are intrusions of molten magma that cut through existing rock layers. The discussion highlights the complexity of geological processes and the need for further understanding of these features, as well as the potential for misconceptions in interpreting geological formations.
maze
Messages
661
Reaction score
4
Large parallel "slashes" through topography

What causes these huge (dozens of miles long) parallel "slashes" through topography like seen in this photo??:
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/7817/geomacrostripesid1.png

Here is another one:
http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/7121/macroslash2gp2.png

The pattern is so regular, it looks like someone took 50 mile wide comb and scratched the Earth's surface with it. You can see the slash marks cut through the "more natural" river flows too.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org


Hard to tell on these pictures alone... On the top picture it looks like a lot of the river valleys are follwing lines of weakness. Can't tell what the weakness is, but it could be igneous dykes or a faults. I can't quite get my head round the topography on no.2 but it looks like two sets of ridges & furrows running at right angles. I'm more inclined to think dykes than faults because I can't see any displacement where they cross.
I don't know the area's geology so I can't tell you any more.

Could you link to the second on google maps? I wouldn't mind a closer look.
 


Ok after a little research, these look like transform faults qualitatively:
transf.jpg


But the thing is the previous pictures are in Utah, which is nowhere near a tectonic plate boundary.
 


You get faults everywhere, not just near boundaries. I still wouldn't rule out dykes.
 


Pretty amazing features, showing that we still have a long way to go before understanding and it also suggest that things we think we know for sure, aint so.
 
On google Earth you can see that it is a canyon that has exploited two sets of lines of weakness at right angles to one another. My bet is still faults or dykes but I can't confirm. See if you can find the area on this geological map: http://geology.utah.gov/maps/geomap/parkmaps/pdf/M-87.pdf
 


Where can I find more background on geological dikes? Right now what I find basically says "dikes are intrusions that cut across a geological body". Well that's kind of circular - it doesn't explain what causes these formations to occur in the first place. Thanks.
 


Basically, when molten magma is on the move within Earth it squeezes upwards through the pre-existing rock. When it sets below the surface to form an igneous rock it is known as an intrusion. It can come in all kinds of shapes and sizes, and it's known as a dyke where it is tabular in shape and cuts through beds of rock, rather than following the bedding planes. If the dyke is harder than the surrounding rock it will often stand up as a ridge. If softer, it will erode more easily and form a furrow, valley etc...

Does that clear things up?
 
  • #10


Err, but what causes it to be in straight lines like this?
 
  • #11


I'm certainly no expert on geomorphology, but I'd say they are faults.

If they are dykes, then they are probably still faults because dykes are basically just igneaus intrusions along pre-existing lines of weakness which are usually faults anyway.

Also, I would normally expect dykes to form ridges, because they tend to be composed of stuff that is more resistant to weathering than the surrounding "country" rock. To me those lines of weakness look like topographic lows, or valleys, although I am aware that to the untrained eye these images can be deceiving, so, I'd guess they are faults.
 
  • #12


billiards said:
I'm certainly no expert on geomorphology, but I'd say they are faults.



That fact, that Northern and South America made uniform Euroasian continent to a science it is known for a long time, Dynamic model
has proved why there was break Ms and in general the description of a consequence of a divergence of continents; a photo no.3
where the topography of a bottom of Atlantic is shown has allowed to specify the following details: from the basic continent Euroasian
after break Ms parts of Southern and Northern America were separated and under action of centripetal force have started to leave,
there has not come yet dynamic balance in system of weights (Ms/magma/nucleus of planet); after that there were conditions for
the beginnings of processes III natural phenomenon; the conclusion:в the period "stone" from here follows when the continent Euroasian made a single whole of Atlantic ocean was not, after break Ms and during removal of parts of the American continents was formed
the crack which was filled by viscous weight of an intermediate layer which distinctly allocated now at the bottom of Atlantic; such
in the image of DM has proved changes in a final phase "stone", "bronze" and "iron" periods
 
Back
Top