Laser physics question about Milonni book

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter contempquant
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Laser Physics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the variables p(z) and q(z) in the Gaussian beam solution presented in Peter Milonni's book, "Laser Physics." The equation provided, ε(ĥr) = Ae^(ik(x²+y²)/2q(z))e^(ip(z)), indicates that p(z) and q(z) are not arbitrary constants but functions of z, derived from the paraxial wave equation. The Milonni & Eberly book elaborates on these variables, defining q(z) in terms of the wavefront radius of curvature R and spot size w, specifically through the equation 1/q(z) = 1/R(z) + iλ/(πw²(z)). The term e^(ip(z)) represents the complex phase information of the beam, affecting both the electric field magnitude and phase variations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gaussian beam theory
  • Familiarity with the paraxial wave equation
  • Knowledge of complex numbers in physics
  • Basic concepts of wavefront curvature and spot size
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Gaussian beam parameters in "Lasers" by Milonni & Eberly
  • Explore the implications of complex phase factors in wave optics
  • Investigate the paraxial approximation in laser beam propagation
  • Learn about wavefront radius of curvature and its impact on beam quality
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, laser physics researchers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Gaussian beam behavior and its mathematical foundations.

contempquant
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have the book by Peter Milonni, Laser Physics. Does anyone who has this know what the [tex]p(z)[/tex] and [tex]q(z)[/tex] represent in the equation on gaussian beam solution to a 'beamlike' wave on page 282, under the chapter 7.5 "Gaussian beams"?

[tex]\epsilon(\bar{r})=Ae^{ik(x^{2}+y^{2})/{2q(z)}}e^{ip(z)}[/tex]

I can't work it out, and can't find any previous info on them in the book, are they just arbitrary constants?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The book Lasers by Milonni & Eberly has the same equation in section 14.5, "Gaussian Beams", along with a derivation of q(z) and p(z).

They are assuming a solution to the paraxial equation of the form you wrote, where q and p are functions of z (not constants) that are to be worked out using the paraxial wave equation appearing on the previous page.

The Milloni & Eberly book proceeds with a derivation of what q and p are -- does your book not do this? At any rate, it turns out that q is defined in terms of the wavefront radius of curvature R and spot size w by

1/q(z) = 1/R(z) + iλ/(πw2(z))​

The factor eip(z) is a complex number, and gives the following information about the beam:
  • The z-dependence of the on-axis (x=y=0) electric field magnitude, and
  • Variations in the on-axis phase; more specifically, departures from the approximate eikz phase dependence.

I'm not really sure why he/they wrote it as eip(z), it seems they could more simply have written it as say f(z), without the exponential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K