I Lattice specific heat, help understanding a passage in Ziman's book

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Hi, I don't understand why the author in calculating the expression for the specific heat, divides by ##1/V## (the total volume).
12.jpg


Also, in calculating the fraction of modes with frequency in the range ##v##, ##v+dv## he divides by ##V## (eq. 2.65, 2.67)

11.jpg
Thanks,
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is extensive (varies with system size), and dividing by another extensive quantity (volume) gives an intensive quantity. In this case, it’s volumetric heat capacity. Mass or molar heat capacity (where you divide the derivative of heat wrt temperature by mass or amount of substance) are more familiar, but it’s the same idea: you’re looking for a property which is independent of the size of the system.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dRic2
dRic2 said:
Also, in calculating the fraction of modes with frequency in the range v, v+dv he divides by V (eq. 2.65, 2.67)
The same as indicated by @TeethWhitener: The phonon density of states gives the number of modes per unit frequency per unit volume of real space.
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2
Thank you very much. I had to be sure because it was not explicitly specified, although it might be intuitive.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top