Launching a Penny Accurately - Advice Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter newtonsmac
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a device to launch a penny accurately between 0.0m and 10.0m using common household materials and recyclables. The user is considering options like a catapult or trebuchet versus a compressed air mechanism, expressing a preference for air-based designs but lacking knowledge on building a homemade compressor. Suggestions include starting with a simpler ramp and adjustable spring mechanism for accuracy, with calibration through trial runs. The importance of safety and the willingness to invest time in the project are also emphasized. Overall, the conversation seeks innovative ideas for penny-launching mechanisms.
newtonsmac
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Greetings fellow smart people.

I am looking into making a device that can accurately launch a penny 0.0m to 10.0m quite accurately. I do not know whether I should a siege projectile launcher such as a catapult or trebuchet or something using compressed air. I want to try to make this out of common household stuff and recyclables but I probably will have to buy a few things from a hardware store. I don’t want it to be dangerous and I am willing to spend a lot of time and patience on it.

I myself am interested in air, but then again I have no idea how to make one without using compressed CO2 or a bike pump. I want it to be made with a home made compressor.

Trebuchet and catapult are fairly simple but aren’t that original. If you guys know of any other mechanisms that can launch a penny accurately please let me know or tell me which one I should use.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Newtonsmac.
You might want to start with something simpler and cheaper, such as a ramp with an adjustable spring.
 
how would you adjust the spring accurately?
 
Just connect the front end (for an extension spring) or the rear end (for a compression spring) to a threaded rod which protrudes through the case. An adjustment nut can then be turned to move the rod in and out. Calibration would be by trial runs, with notes taken of the position required for a particular distance.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top