How Much Less Do You Weigh at the Top of the World Trade Center?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertmatthew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation Law
AI Thread Summary
At sidewalk level outside the World Trade Center, a person weighing 518 N experiences a slight decrease in weight when ascending to the top of the 410 m tower due to increased distance from Earth's center. Initial calculations suggested a weight of 517.94 N at the top, indicating a difference of 0.0575 N. However, using the inverse square law of gravity, a more accurate calculation showed the weight would actually be approximately 0.0666 N less than at sidewalk level. This discrepancy was resolved by correctly adjusting the radius in the gravitational formula. The final understanding confirms that weight decreases slightly with elevation due to gravitational effects.
robertmatthew
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You weigh 518 N at sidewalk level outside the World Trade Center in New York City. Suppose that you ride from this level to the top of one of its 410 m towers. Ignoring Earth's rotation, how much less would you weigh there (because you are slightly farther from the center of Earth)?

Homework Equations


F = (GMm)/r2
Mass of Earth: 5.97x1024 kg
Radius of Earth: 6378100 m

The Attempt at a Solution


518 = ((6.67x10-11)(5.97x1024)(m))/(63781002)
m = 52.92 kg

F = (GMm)/(r+h)2
F' = ((6.67x10-11)(5.97x1024)(52.80))/(63785102)
F' = 517.94 N

So my calculated difference is .0575 N, but apparently that's not right. Not sure where I've gone wrong here, any help is much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
robertmatthew said:

Homework Statement


You weigh 518 N at sidewalk level outside the World Trade Center in New York City. Suppose that you ride from this level to the top of one of its 410 m towers. Ignoring Earth's rotation, how much less would you weigh there (because you are slightly farther from the center of Earth)?

Homework Equations


F = (GMm)/r2
Mass of Earth: 5.97x1024 kg
Radius of Earth: 6378100 m

The Attempt at a Solution


518 = ((6.67x10-11)(5.97x1024)(m))/(63781002)
m = 52.92 kg

F = (GMm)/(r+h)2
F' = ((6.67x10-11)(5.97x1024)(52.80))/(63785102)
F' = 517.94 N

So my calculated difference is .0575 N, but apparently that's not right. Not sure where I've gone wrong here, any help is much appreciated.

Look at \displaystyle \ \frac{1}{r^2}-\frac{1}{(r+h)^2}<br /> =\frac{r^2+2rh+h^2-r^2}{r^2(r+h^2)}=\frac{2rh+h^2}{r^2(r+h^2)}\approx\frac{2h}{r^3}\ .
 
robertmatthew said:

Homework Statement


You weigh 518 N at sidewalk level outside the World Trade Center in New York City. Suppose that you ride from this level to the top of one of its 410 m towers. Ignoring Earth's rotation, how much less would you weigh there (because you are slightly farther from the center of Earth)?


Homework Equations


F = (GMm)/r2
Mass of Earth: 5.97x1024 kg
Radius of Earth: 6378100 m


The Attempt at a Solution


518 = ((6.67x10-11)(5.97x1024)(m))/(63781002)
m = 52.92 kg

F = (GMm)/(r+h)2
F' = ((6.67x10-11)(5.97x1024)(52.80))/(63785102)
F' = 517.94 N

So my calculated difference is .0575 N, but apparently that's not right. Not sure where I've gone wrong here, any help is much appreciated.

Gravity is an inverse square relation, so I would add 410 to the Earth radius you had to find the ratio of increase [I get that r is now 1.000064 times the original. Square that 1.000129
so the inverse says the weight force is reduced by that factor.

518 / 1.000129 gave me about 0.0666 N less than 518, rather than your .0575 answer.
 
Thank you both very much, got the right answer and I actually understand how I got there!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top