Schools Lawrence University vs UW-Madison (Undergraduate physics)

AI Thread Summary
Choosing between UW-Madison and Lawrence University for physics preparation involves considering the distinct environments of each institution. UW-Madison, a large state university, offers extensive resources, a wider variety of courses, and significant on-campus research opportunities, which can be beneficial for graduate school preparation. In contrast, Lawrence University, a smaller liberal arts college, provides a more intimate learning atmosphere with smaller class sizes, close faculty interactions, and greater freedom for independent projects. Both institutions can adequately prepare students for graduate studies, but the decision should be based on personal fit and where one feels happiest and most supported. Experiences shared highlight that while graduates from smaller colleges often receive personalized attention and strong recommendations from professors, larger universities may offer broader academic options and networking opportunities. Ultimately, the choice should align with individual preferences and learning styles, with a noted inclination towards Lawrence University emerging in the discussion.
ZHHuang
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, it is hard for me to make a choice between UW-Madison and Lawrence University. Which college can better prepare me for the physics graduate school? Can anybody give me some advice? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your best preparation will be at the place where you thrive, are happy, and grow as a human being and a scholar. Either institution will offer you good and sufficient undergraduate training in physics. Certainly Madison has more name recognition in engineering and physics, but you must decide what best matches your predilections and plays to your strengths. The good news is that if you work hard and remain interested you will be happy with either choice. Good luck.and make the most of it.
 
  • Like
Likes ZHHuang
I suspect you might not be in the US (China perhaps?). If that is true, have you visited both schools? They are very different types of schools: large state university versus small liberal-arts college/university. I don't think China (or indeed most other countries) has schools of the second type, so they might be a new thing for you. They're a very different environment than a large university like UW-Madison.

I did my undergraduate at a school similar to Lawrence but even smaller. Classes were small, and we had easy access to professors outside of class. We had a lot of freedom to pursue our own projects, subject of course to the limitations of the available facilities. All the upperclass physics majors had keys so we could get into the building and labs whenever we wanted. We socialized a lot with each other, usually in a study room in the department. The professors knew us well and could write letters of recommendation based on extensive experience with each of us.

On the other hand, we didn't have the large variety of courses, or the wide range of on-campus research, that a large university like UW-Madison offers.

My graduating class had five physics majors. All of us went to graduate school: three in physics (U of Michigan (me), Ohio State U, and Tufts U), one in engineering, and one in applied math (operations research). In the end, only one (me) became a physics professor, at a similar small school. One switched from physics to engineering and ended up at a large company. One became a technical writer. One became an engineering professor at a large university, doing research in robotics. I don't know what happened to the "math" person.

As hutchphd said, you can probably prepare well for graduate school at either place, but the living and learning experiences are very different. It comes down to which one is a better "fit" for you.
 
  • Like
Likes ZHHuang and hutchphd
Thank for your answers. I was a fan of the liberal art colleges, and chose Reed College as my early decision. After deferred by Reed, I started to think about other options. I am inclined to choose Lawrence University now.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
19K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Back
Top