Chemistry  Learn About Moles: 1.00 Mol of Oxygen Molecules

  • Thread starter Thread starter xCanx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Moles
AI Thread Summary
1.00 mol of oxygen molecules refers to 6.022 x 10^23 O2 molecules, as a mole is defined by Avogadro's number. Each O2 molecule consists of two oxygen atoms, but the question specifically asks for the number of molecules, not atoms. The concept of moles serves as a quantifying unit for large quantities, similar to how a dozen quantifies twelve items. Understanding that O2 is a diatomic molecule is important, but it does not change the fact that 1 mole corresponds to 6.022 x 10^23 molecules of O2. Therefore, 1.00 mol of oxygen molecules equals 6.022 x 10^23 O2 molecules.
xCanx
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
The questions is arranged like this:

1.00 mol of oxygen molecules ? oxygen molecules

I know an oxygen molecule is 02, so would it be 2 oxygen molecules?

It's my first day learning moles, so I'm very lost about the 1.00 mol.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A mole is equal to Avogadro's number in atoms/molecules. I don't think oxygen being diatomic plays a part in this since it's asking for the number of oxygen molecules.
 
1 mol of O2 x 6.0221415 × 10^23 molecules / mol = number of oxygen molecules in a mole
 
just think of "moles" as a quantifying unit

in order of magnitude: (small to big)
"one", "ten", "dozen", "hundred", "thousand", "million", "billion", "moles"

1 dozen of something = 1 x 12 = 12 something
1 moles of something = 1 x 6.022 x 10^23 = 6.022 x 10^23 something
 
There would be two oxygen atoms per a diatomic oxygen molecule, but O2 by itself is a molecule, not a single atom.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top